jRCT2080221543未知3 期
A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group, active controlled multi-center clinical trial to evaluate the additional efficacy and safety of Olmesartan Medoxomil/Amlodipine 20/5 mg in Chinese patients with mild or moderate essential hypertension who failed to achieve their goal with Olmesartan Medoxomil 20mg monotherapy
试验速览
- 阶段
- 3 期
- 入组人数
- 252
- 主要终点
- Compare the mean change in trough SeDBP from baseline to Visit 6 between two groups
研究概览
简要总结
暂无简介。
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 干预模型
- This study was designed as a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, parallel group, multi-center clinical trial.
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18age old over 至 75age old under(—)
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •Outpatients with mild or moderate essential hypertension if they satisfy the following main inclusion criteria:
- •Male or female, age of 18-75 years (inclusive);
- •At visit 3, Mean SeDBP >= 95 mmHg and <110 mmHg;
- •At visit 4, Mean SeDBP >= 90 mmHg;
- •No significant abnormality in hematology, kidney, liver, cardiovascular or endocrinology system;
- •Subject was willing and able to take study medications as prescribed and complied with other study requirements;
- •Subject was able to give his/her written informed consent to participate in this study.
- •During the whole study, the subject will be removed from the study immediately and given appropriate treatment if his/her mean SeDBP>=110 mmHg and/or mean SeSBP>=180 mmHg.
排除标准
- 未提供
结局指标
主要结局
Compare the mean change in trough SeDBP from baseline to Visit 6 between two groups
时间窗: Visit 6
BP values measured at Visit 4 is taken as baseline value
次要结局
- Compare the mean change in trough SeSBP from Visit 4 to Visit 6 between two groups(Visit 4 to Visit 6)
- Compare the mean change in trough SeDBP and trough SeSBP from Visit 4 to Visit 5 between two groups(Visit 4 to Visit 5)
- Evaluate the percentage of responders in the two groups at Visit 5 and Visit 6(Visit 5 and Visit 6)
研究者
相似试验
招募中
不适用
A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study, comparing the efficacy and safety of remibrutinib versus teriflunomide in participants with relapsing multiple (Efficacy and safety of remibrutinib compared to teriflunomide in participants with relapsing multiple sclerosis, followed by long term treatment with remibrutinib. )jRCT2071220034Novartis Pharma. K.K.30
进行中(未招募)
1 期
Efficacy and safety of remibrutinib compared to teriflunomide in participants with relapsing multiple sclerosis, followed by long term treatment with remibrutinibMedDRA version: 27.0Level: PTClassification code 10080700Term: Relapsing multiple sclerosisSystem Organ Class: 10029205 - Nervous system disordersMultiple SclerosisEUCTR2020-005929-89-PLovartis Pharma AG800
进行中(未招募)
1 期
Study of efficacy and safety of ofatumumab compared to teriflunomide in patients with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosisMedDRA version: 20.0Level: PTClassification code 10048393Term: Multiple sclerosis relapseSystem Organ Class: 10029205 - Nervous system disordersmultiple sclerosisEUCTR2015-005419-33-HUovartis Pharma Services AG1,313
进行中(未招募)
1 期
Efficacy and safety of a progestin and an aromatase inhibitor combined in a intravaginal ring in symptomatic endometriosis.EndometriosisEUCTR2013-005090-53-BEBayer HealthCare AG318
招募中
3 期
Efficacy and Safety of Remibrutinib Compared to Teriflunomide in Participants With Relapsing Multiple SclerosisCTRI/2022/09/045669ovartis Healthcare Pvt Ltd
