跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06118554
NCT06118554招募中不适用

3D Printing for Topical Nasal Corticosteroid Irrigations: a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Ohio State University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 200 人开始时间: 2021年11月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
入组人数
200
试验地点
1
主要终点
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of nasal congestion score

研究概览

简要总结

Three-dimensional (3D) printing has been an emerging technology with uses in a wide array of fields. This research aims to use 3D printing as a tool to provide personalized education to maximize treatment efficacy based on the patient's individual anatomy. With increased irrigation to the sinuses, we hypothesize there will be improved patient satisfaction and higher quality of life. The outcomes of this research could lead to a new option for patients who live with chronic rhinosinusitis are not candidates for surgery or are interested in less invasive options. The 3D printed nasal replica is not something that would be implanted, rather it is a hand-held device used specifically for participants to better understand their nasal anatomy.

详细描述

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is one of the most common medical conditions in the US, affecting an estimated 13% of adults, or some 30 million people. It accounts for 12.5 million physician office visits each year and an annual health care expenditure of $5.8 billion (National Health Interview Survey 2009, CDC). Major symptoms include nasal obstruction, facial pain/pressure, nasal discharge, purulence in the nasal cavity, and loss of smell. These symptoms significantly impact patient quality of life, even compared to chronic debilitating diseases such as diabetes and congestive heart failure.

Topical therapies play an integral role in the management of CRS, and high-volume irrigation delivery (e.g., neti pot, squeeze bottles) is more effective for achieving distribution to the sinuses than other topical delivery methods such as nasal sprays, nebulizers, or atomizers. Saline irrigations have been recommended in a number of clinical scenarios, including initial management of CRS and postoperative care. High-volume irrigations have also shown benefits for medication delivery, such as with mupirocin and corticosteroids. However, due to the intricate and variable anatomy of the human nasal airway, the efficacy of topical irrigations is inconsistent and difficult to predict. Previous studies from our group and others have shown that nasal irrigant may not reliably penetrate all sinuses, and the effectiveness varies depending on specific sinuses, head positions, injection angle, pressure, flow rates, and other factors. We currently do not have a clear understanding of the optimal delivery technique(s). In efforts to improve these outcomes, the efficacy of topical irrigation delivery to target sinuses is an area of active research. Yet, investigations have been limited by labor-intensive methodologies, such as cadaver studies or using colored dyes followed by endoscopy to visualize where the irrigation might have reached. Other studies have used irrigations with iodinated contrast followed by computed tomography (CT) scans to determine which sinuses collect contrast material. Similarly, technetium 99m sulfur colloid and fluorescein have also been used as tracers to visualize the distribution of sinus irrigations. These labor-intensive techniques are difficult to apply to a large sample size. They increase patient risk and commonly capture only where the irrigation fluid has been at the end of irrigation, but not the details of irrigation flow paths that would allow us to understand why the irrigation outcomes vary.

From both patients' and clinicians' perspectives, the lack of clear prediction of patient-specific irrigation outcomes can be frustrating, as clinicians prescribe a rigorous daily irrigation routine but have no assurance that what patients are doing is effective. When symptoms fail to improve after courses of irrigation, it is difficult to determine whether the added medication is not working, or the irrigation does not reach clinically relevant targets deep within the sinuses. Many patients and surgeons thus opt for systemic medication or surgery, which increases risk of overmedication, growth of resistant organisms, systemic side effects, and serious risk from surgery.

The purpose of this study was to propose a novel idea: applying three-dimensional (3D)-printing technology based on individual patients' computed tomography (CT) scans to determine an optimal personalized nasal irrigation strategy (head positions, angle of injection, flow rates, etc.).

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Double (Care Provider, Investigator)

盲法说明

The study was single-blinded as the MG patients unavoidably knew of their experimental group assignment due to the provided 3D-printed nasal model. However, patients in BG and CG were not told the existence of other groups. Clinical providers were blinded to the patients' assigned group when assessing clinical outcomes and Lund-Mackay score, and the principal investigator was blinded to the patients' clinical outcomes.

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 75 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •Chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyps (CRSsNP) or Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP).

排除标准

  • •Patients with significant nasal polyps (as determined by a clinician) were excluded upfront due to the unlikeness of irrigation penetration regardless of the head position. Patients with significant atopy, cystic fibrosis, granulomatosis with polyangiitis or other connective tissue disorder, and current pregnancy were also excluded.

研究组 & 干预措施

Control group

Active Comparator

The control group (CG) irrigated in the standard FDA consumer-recommended position, defined as leaning forward with a natural ear-to-shoulder head tilt.

干预措施: Irrigation head position (Other)

Backfill group

Experimental

Backfill group (BG) subjects irrigated with a head tilt of 90 degrees ear-to-shoulder and used the nostril closest to the ground.

干预措施: Irrigation head position (Other)

Model group

Experimental

Finally, the model group (MG) irrigated in an optimal position based on their 3D nasal replica. This patient-specific position was communicated to each MG patient with clear instructions during an in-person training session.

干预措施: Irrigation head position (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of nasal congestion score

时间窗: completed at baseline and after 8 weeks of treatment.

patient-reported outcome measure

22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) score

时间窗: completed at baseline and after 8 weeks of treatment.

patient-reported outcome measure

Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) score

时间窗: completed at baseline and after 8 weeks of treatment.

patient-reported outcome measure

Lund-Mackay (LM) score of sinus inflammation.

时间窗: assessed from CT scans taken at baseline and after 8 weeks of treatment.

Objective rating of sinus inflammation

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Kai Zhao

Associate Professor

Ohio State University

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验