跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03121560
NCT03121560已完成不适用

Acceptability and Tolerance of Hysteroscopy and Hysterosonography in Consultation

Brugmann University Hospital2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 110 人开始时间: 2017年11月14日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
110
试验地点
2
主要终点
EVA pain scale

研究概览

简要总结

Menorrhagia is frequent and occur in 11 to 13 % of the general population. It accounts for 20% of the gynecological consultations and tends to increase with age. It can be the first symptom of a mild uterine disease or cancer (cervical or endometrial), especially if the patient is older. The most common causes are polyps, adenomyosis, fibroids, hyperplasia and cancer.

Menorrhagia needs to be investigated -especially after menopause, when the prevalence of endometrial cancer is higher (10-15%). For premenopausal metrorrhagia, the assessment will be made if a pathology is suspected or if there is no response to the medical treatment within 3 to 6 months.

The medical check-up consists in the first instance in a questionnaire, a clinical examination and an endovaginal ultrasound examination. If the endometrium is thickened, a focal pathology is suspected, or if the bleeding persists despite a normal endovaginal ultrasound result, further examinations including a possible biopsy are required.

While hysteroscopy is widely accepted as a standard examination for uterine cavity exploration, a meta-analysis showed that the diagnostic performance of hysterosonography was equivalent. Both are carried out on an outpatient basis during a gynecological consultation and require no special preparation. Several studies seem to show that hysterosonography is less painful, causes less discomfort and is therefore more accepted by patients than hysteroscopy. This is why many practitioners continue to prefer it to hysteroscopy and associate it with the Pipelle of Cornier for the assessment of postmenopausal metrorrhagia.

However, if endometrial cancer is confirmed, the histological type detected within the biopsy is the main predictor of the severity of the disease and the treatment to be given. It is therefore essential to have an accurate biopsy sampling prior to therapeutic management. It is not the case with blind biopsies (without visual control). Indeed, some studies showed that the concordance between the optical aspect of the endometrium under hysteroscopy and the histological result was close to 90%, validating the hypothesis of an improved sensitivity through visual control.

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) currently recommends an endovaginal ultrasound assessment followed by an endometrial biopsy in the event of a thickened endometrium or when a pathology is suspected. A biopsy can even be taken during the consultation, at the onset of the complaints. The last recommendations of December 2010 leave the choice to clinicians regarding the histological diagnostic modalities (a blind biopsy with the Pipelle of Cornier or a targeted biopsy under hysteroscopy), although the biopsies under hysteroscopy are recommended since 2015. However, despite its poor sensitivity, the most widely used technique in the world is the blind biopsy by aspiration performed after vaginal ultrasound or hysterosonography because it is an easy low cost method.

The development of hysteroscopes with a smaller diameter and the introduction of the vaginoscopy have considerably increased the tolerance of this examination. In addition, hysteroscopy allows a simultaneous therapeutic intervention for certain indications, which is comfortable and well accepted by the patients. Unfortunately, there are few studies comparing the tolerance of the two examinations performed according to the current recommendations of good practice of hysteroscopy. Only one comparative randomized study in 2008 showed that saline infusion sonography (SIS) was less painful than hysteroscopy with vaginoscopy. However, direct comparison was impossible since women only had one of the two examinations.

The Brugmann University Hospital set up a consultation called "one stop bleeding clinic" in which the two examinations are performed for each patient with abnormal bleedings, in order to increase diagnostic performance.

All included patients will thus undergo a saline infusion sonography (SIS) and a hysteroscopy (HSC). Each procedure will be evaluated on pain level (EVA scale) and tolerance by the patient.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Crossover
主要目的
Diagnostic
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
Female
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Women with abnormal bleedings (post-menopausal menorrhagia or metrorrhagia managed at bleeding clinic) without endometrial measurement criteria.
  • Level of French/Dutch sufficient to understand the informed consent document and the pain evaluation scale

排除标准

  • Spontaneous intake of an analgesic before the examinations
  • Women who already had an SIS or hysteroscopy

结局指标

主要结局

EVA pain scale

时间窗: 5 minutes after the examination

Visual analogic pain scale. It is a graduated horizontal or vertical scale of 10 cm with 2 marks: 0 for the complete absence of pain and 10 for the worst lived pain.

次要结局

  • Number of side effects(2 days)
  • Histological diagnose performance of each technique(2 days)
  • Patient tolerance(2 days)
  • Examination duration(2 days)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Andre Nazac

Head of clinic

Brugmann University Hospital

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Acceptability and Tolerance of Hysteroscopy and... | 临床试验