跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT00402844
NCT00402844已完成2 期

A Multicenter Clinical Safety Assessment of Polypropylene Transvaginal Mesh in Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery

Karolinska Institutet28 个研究点 分布在 4 个国家目标入组 250 人开始时间: 2006年8月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
2 期
状态
已完成
入组人数
250
试验地点
28
主要终点
Immediate and delayed TVM-related complications.

研究概览

简要总结

Pelvic organ prolapse is characterized by a lack of pelvic floor support causing the pelvic organs and vaginal walls to protrude. For decades, suture repair techniques have been the primary choice of surgical treatment when indicated.

The notion of reinforcing pelvic floor defects using biomaterial implants is not an exclusively contemporary idea. Traditional surgical techniques are frequently associated with unsatisfying anatomical recurrence rates and over the years sporadic attempts have been made to introduce novel surgical techniques using a variety of biomaterials as support with varying success. It is plausible that inherently weak, or damaged, pelvic floor supportive tissues need to be reinforced by a permanent support to avoid the high rates of recurrences commonly described using traditional techniques. However, use of biomaterials in pelvic reconstructive surgery has become widespread in just a few years despite a lack of clinical safety data, or compelling clinical evidence demonstrating that it improves outcomes compared to traditional suture techniques.

It is likely that biomaterials need to be "anchored" in tissues not afflicted by the disease, in order to provide the intended pelvic floor support. This has given rise to transvaginal surgical techniques using a transobturator approach passing the mesh through the arcus tendineous fascia pelvis, or the sacrospinous ligaments through a transgluteal approach. Already commercially available implant materials are in need of patient safety documentation, both when considering the surgical techniques by which these materials are placed in the body as well as the actual materials. Complication rates and perioperative morbidity using these surgical routes in pelvic organ prolapse surgery are generally unknown.

The aim of the present study was to assess the long term morbidity, and describe the complications, associated with transvaginal mesh repair of pelvic organ prolapse using the PROLIFT®-system.

详细描述

Main objective:

  • To describe short and long-term complications associated with pelvic organ prolapse repair using macroporous polypropylene transvaginal mesh (TVM) using a transobturator or transgluteal approach.

Secondary objectives:

  • To describe anatomical restoration of the pelvic floor following transvaginal mesh repair of pelvic organ prolapse using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system (POP-Q).
  • To describe subjective patient outcomes using validated questionnaires with regard to pelvic organ function (UDI), sexual function (PISQ) and quality of life (IIQ).

Study design:

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Non Randomized
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
Female
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Pelvic organ prolapse stage 2 or more according to the POP-Q staging system
  • Symptoms related to pelvic organ prolapse including bulging, pelvic heaviness and vaginal protrusion
  • Able to make an informed consent to participate
  • Physically and mentally able to participate in follow-up

排除标准

  • Previous pelvic organ cancer regardless of treatment
  • Severe rheumatic disease requiring per oral steroid treatment
  • Systemic connective tissue disorder (SLE, Sjögrens syndrome, Marfans syndrome, Ehlers Danhlos, collagenosis, polymyositis or polymyalgia rheumatica)
  • Physically or mentally unable to participate in follow-up or give informed consent to participate in the study

结局指标

主要结局

Immediate and delayed TVM-related complications.

时间窗: 1 year

次要结局

  • Anatomical outcome using the validated POP-Q staging system.(1 year)
  • Subjective outcome using the validated UDI, IIQ and PISQ.(1 year)

研究者

申办方类型
Other

研究点 (28)

Loading locations...

相似试验