跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04919772
NCT04919772已完成不适用

Assessing the Reliability and Validity of 4-meter and 10-meter Walking Test for Measurements of Gait Speed and Their Correlation With 5-repetition Sit-to-stand Test in Chronic Stroke Survivors

Universitat Internacional de Catalunya1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 20 人开始时间: 2021年5月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
20
试验地点
1
主要终点
Validity of 4-meter walking test

研究概览

简要总结

The 4-meter walk test and 10-meter walk test is currently applied to assess gait speed.These tools are frequently used in clinical trials and were also shown to be reliable measurement methods. There are ocassions where it is not possible to have a long corridor to measure gait speed. It is necessary to have a tool to evaluate gait speed in a small space as 4-meter walk test.

详细描述

Walking speed is an important aspect of gait and is commonly used as an objective measure of functional mobility in both clinical and research settings. The majority who have suffered a stroke tend to have gait disturbances. Regaining locomotor ability is one of the primary goals in stroke rehabilitation, and it is most commonly measured using changes in self-selected walking speed. Although many of them can walk independently, they do not do so with enough speed and endurance to allow them to perform their activities of daily living prior to stroke. Not only is self-selected walking speed simple, cost effective, reliable, valid, sensitive, and specific, but it is also highly related to the severity of impairment and predicts functional walking status. It is recommended as a "vital sign" of health. Improvements in walking speed of 0.1 m/s or more have been shown to be a predictor of good health. However, decreased walking speed has been related to worse health outcomes and frailty in older people.

The 4-meter walk test (4 MWT) and 10-meter walk test (10 MWT) is currently applied using various timing protocols and distance covered that may affect data interpretation with a standard value, and comparisons among the studies. There are two protocols to measure walking speed, static and flying start. A static start (i.e., record the time used to cover a total walkway or from the start to stop walking) or a flying start (i.e., measured the time while walking in the middle of the walkway).

The aim of this study is to investigate the test-retest reliability of the 4 MWT and 10 MWT and their correlation with 5-repetition sit-to-stand in chronic stroke survivors.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Cross Sectional

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • All study participants are clinically diagnosed with stroke
  • Adult participants, defined as >18 years of age
  • Have preserved cognitive ability: Achieve a score equal to or greater than 25 points on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment test.
  • Have the ability to walk on a flat surface of at least 20 meters, with or without aid.

排除标准

  • A history of lower extremities injury or surgery
  • A history of botulinum injection within 3 months
  • A history of inflammatory arthritis
  • A history of inflammatory myopathy or peripheral nervous disease
  • A history of other neurological disease as a Parkinson, spinal cord etc.

结局指标

主要结局

Validity of 4-meter walking test

时间窗: 1 hour later from baseline

Validity is the extent to which a concept, conclusion or measurement is well-founded and likely corresponds accurately to the real world

Reliability of 10-meter walking test

时间窗: 1 hour later from baseline

Reliability is the overall consistency of a measure.

Reliability of 4-meter walking test

时间窗: 1 hour later from baseline

Reliability is the overall consistency of a measure.

Validity of 10-meter walking test

时间窗: 1 hour later from baseline

Validity is the extent to which a concept, conclusion or measurement is well-founded and likely corresponds accurately to the real world

次要结局

  • Correlation of 5-repetition sit-to-stand with 4-meter walking test(Baseline)
  • Correlation of 5-repetition sit-to-stand with 10-meter walking test(Baseline)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Rosa Cabanas Valdés

Principal investigator

Universitat Internacional de Catalunya

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验