跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06355817
NCT06355817已完成不适用

Distraction Techniques in Periocular Anesthesia: Tapping vs Vibration

University of Manitoba1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 80 人开始时间: 2023年9月21日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
80
试验地点
1
主要终点
Pain Reduction in Tapping vs Vibration distraction techniques in peri-ocular local anesthesia

研究概览

简要总结

To compare the efficacy of topical tapping vs vibration in lowering pain scores for periocular anesthesia injections.

详细描述

Participants will be selected from 3 local oculoplastics surgeons' procedural slates during the study period. Eligible participants are those who will be undergoing bilateral eye procedures. They will be randomized into one of two groups: Group A will receive tapping on their forehead for their first eye injection of local anesthesia, and then vibration to their forehead for the second eye. Group B will receive the reverse. Pain scores will be aggregated and an average taken to help determine which method is superior. The vibration assist device (variety of facial massagers are available on Amazon for roughly $16-20CDN) is being considered in addition to the current standard of tapping or no tactile distraction at all during the injection of local anesthetic. The 11-point pain Visual Analog Scale will be used to help grade pain experience after each eye is frozen. To help qualify, if there is a difference, the patient will be asked if they felt one technique was better than the other by a little, quite a bit, or a lot.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Crossover
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Double (Participant, Care Provider)

盲法说明

The participant and surgeon was not made aware of which intervention the participant would receive first until the time of the procedure. Randomization was made at the time of the procedure.

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •adult patients undergoing elective bilateral eye procedures such as blepharoplasty

排除标准

  • •previous eyelid surgery
  • •inability to give consent

研究组 & 干预措施

Group B: Vibrate then Tap

Experimental

Vibration first, then tapping

干预措施: Tapping (Other)

Group A: Tap then Vibrate

Active Comparator

Tapping for the first eye/side during infiltration of local anesthetic, then vibration for the second eye.

干预措施: Vibration (Device)

Group A: Tap then Vibrate

Active Comparator

Tapping for the first eye/side during infiltration of local anesthetic, then vibration for the second eye.

干预措施: Tapping (Other)

Group B: Vibrate then Tap

Experimental

Vibration first, then tapping

干预措施: Vibration (Device)

结局指标

主要结局

Pain Reduction in Tapping vs Vibration distraction techniques in peri-ocular local anesthesia

时间窗: Immediately after both eyes receive local anesthetic

How effective each intervention was in reducing the pain of peri-ocular local anesthesia, as graded on an 11-point Visual Analog Pain Scale (from 0-10 where 10/10 pain is the worst and 0/10 pain is no pain at all)

次要结局

  • Difference in Pain Reduction(Immediately after both eye receive local anesthetic)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Yen Minh Cung

MD, Principle Investigator

University of Manitoba

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验