跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06093958
NCT06093958撤回不适用

Paradoxical Response to Chest Wall Loading in Mechanically Ventilated Patients: Incidence, Mechanism, and Novel Techniques for Detecting it at the Bedside

HealthPartners Institute2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家开始时间: 2021年12月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
撤回
试验地点
2
主要终点
Lung compliance (mL/mmHg)

研究概览

简要总结

The purposes of our study are to: 1) determine the incidence of paradoxical response to chest wall loading in mechanically ventilated patients; 2) identify sub-populations in which it is most likely to occur (e.g., severe ARDS); and 3) standard the bedside procedure for demonstrating this physiology.

详细描述

Mechanical ventilation can be a life-saving intervention for patients with respiratory failure, but the acutely injured lung is vulnerable to further damage if positive pressure ventilation is not employed judiciously. "Lung protective ventilation" encompasses a group of practices intended to minimize ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) and includes the delivery of low tidal volumes (to minimize dynamic lung strain) and the prevention of injuriously high airway pressures (to minimize lung stress). The prone position, which compresses (or "loads") the chest wall, more evenly distributes volume and pressure, mitigates the damaging effects of stress/strain, and improves clinical outcomes in patients with severe respiratory failure from adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

Chest wall loading would not be expected to produce these beneficial effects in the supine position-quite the opposite; it usually results in net volume loss and higher airway pressures in response to an unchanging tidal volume. A paradoxical response to chest wall loading, leading to decreased airway pressures, however, was recently reported in a group of patients with advanced lung disease secondary to COVID-19. In this cohort, a paradoxical decrease in airway pressures was elicited during a brief period of manual compression of the abdomen.

This maneuver, which is non-invasive, free of cost, and gives real-time information, may have important diagnostic (and potentially therapeutic) implications for ventilator management in patients with respiratory failure.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Na
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Diagnostic
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Non-surgical patients admitted to the ICU at Regions Hospital (St. Paul, MN) or Methodist Hospital (St. Louis Park, MN), receiving mechanical ventilation for any reason, and breathe passively during mechanical ventilation

排除标准

  • Age < 18 years old
  • Pregnancy at the time of their inclusionary hospitalization
  • Recent (< 30 days) abdominal or chest wall surgery (including spine)
  • Recent (< 30 days) abdominal or chest wall trauma (including spine)
  • Traumatic brain injury, intracranial bleed, or recent neurologic surgery
  • Family member or representative not available to provide informed consent
  • Not passive while receiving mechanical ventilation support
  • Hemodynamic instability

结局指标

主要结局

Lung compliance (mL/mmHg)

时间窗: 20 minutes total in measure duration.

Does lung compliance improve (ie, increase) with an intervention (chest wall loading) that decreases chest wall compliance/reduces lung volume.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Paradoxical Response to Chest Wall Loading in... | 临床试验