跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04375306
NCT04375306招募中不适用

Resting Full-cycle Flow Ratio (RFR) Versus Angiography to Guide Revascularization Strategy in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery By-pass Grafting (CABG): RFR-CABG Trial

Diagram B.V.4 个研究点 分布在 3 个国家目标入组 500 人开始时间: 2020年2月3日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
发起方
入组人数
500
试验地点
4
主要终点
Number of participants who deceased, had a Myocardial Infarction (MI), Clinically-Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (CD-TVR), Stroke or Graft Dysfunction at 3 months post CABG

研究概览

简要总结

Different trials have shown that fractional flow reserve (FFR) could successfully guide revascularization in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

It is conceivable that a similar revascularization guidance could be useful also for surgical revascularization i.e. coronary by-pass graft (CABG). Experience learns that grafts placed on vessels with hemodynamically non-significant stenosis often occlude due to competitive antegrade flow.

Resting full-cycle Flow Ratio (RFR) is a measurement performed to evaluate the hemodynamic severity of coronary stenosis. Differently from FFR which is a measurement performed in maximal hyperemia, the RFR is a measurement that is performed in rest and therefore may predict better than FFR the baseline equilibriums that could lead to graft failure, while it has similar capacity to identify hemodynamically significant stenosis as FFR. It is unknown whether RFR guided CABG revascularization is superior as compared to angiography alone.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator)

盲法说明

All patients will undergo RFR and FFR measurement before CABG. RFR and FFR values will be blinded to the patients in both arms. In the control arm (angiography guided CABG) the RFR values will be blinded to the cardiothoracic surgeon.

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • All patients between 18 or older undergoing CABG
  • Patients willing and capable to provide written informed consent

排除标准

  • Previous CABG
  • Concomitant severe valvular disease intervention
  • Remaining (expected) coronary stenosis of > 50% diameter stenosis distally to graft anastomosis
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction <30%
  • Known transmural myocardial infarction
  • Documented microvascular disease
  • RFR/FFR measurement judged impossible
  • Life expectancy <2 years
  • Participation in other investigational clinical trials

结局指标

主要结局

Number of participants who deceased, had a Myocardial Infarction (MI), Clinically-Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (CD-TVR), Stroke or Graft Dysfunction at 3 months post CABG

时间窗: 3 months

次要结局

  • CD-TVR at 3 months post CABG(1 year)
  • CD-TVR at 3 years post CABG(3 years)
  • CD-TVR at 1 year post CABG(1 year)
  • Cut-off value for the RFR that best predicts graft occlusion(Baseline)
  • Number of participants with graft dysfunction at 3 months post CABG(3 months)
  • Major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular event (MACCE), a composite of Death, MI, CD-TVR and Stroke at 1 year(1 year)
  • Major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular event (MACCE), a composite of Death, MI, CD-TVR and Stroke at 3 years(3 years)

研究者

发起方
Diagram B.V.
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (4)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Resting Full-cycle Flow Ratio (RFR) Versus... | 临床试验