跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01615185
NCT01615185终止4 期

A Randomized, Double-blind, Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Amisulpride Versus Low-dose Amisulpride Plus Low-dose Sulpiride in the Treatment of Schizophrenia

Kaohsiung Kai-Suan Psychiatric Hospital1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 96 人开始时间: 2008年1月最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
4 期
状态
终止
入组人数
96
试验地点
1
主要终点
change from baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total scores

研究概览

简要总结

Background: Surveys have shown that antipsychotic drug combinations are frequently prescribed. Amisulpride, an atypical antipsychotic agent, has low incidence of extrapyramidal symptom (EPS) but with high cost compared to sulpiride. The objective of the study is to compare the efficacy and safety of the 800-mg/d amisulpride and 400-mg/d amisulpride plus 800-mg sulpiride in the treatment of acute psychotic exacerbations of schizophrenia.

Method: In this 6-week, double-blind, fixed-dose study, patients with schizophrenia are randomly assigned to amisulpride (800 mg/d) or amisulpride (400 mg/d) plus sulpiride (800 mg/d).The hypothesis is that the two treatment groups have the similar efficacy and safety, but different cost.

详细描述

Background: Antipsychotic monotherapy is recognized as the treatment of choice for patients with schizophrenia. Surveys have shown that antipsychotic drug combinations are frequently prescribed, yet few clinical studies have examined this practice. Amisulpride, an atypical antipsychotic agent, has low incidence of extrapyramidal symptom (EPS) but with high cost compared to sulpiride. It has been reported that mean doses of low-potency typical antipsychotics less than 600 mg/day of chlorpromazine equivalent dose has no higher risk of EPS than atypical antipsychotics. The objective of the study is to compare the efficacy and safety of the 800-mg/d amisulpride and 400-mg/d amisulpride plus 800-mg sulpiride in the treatment of acute psychotic exacerbations of schizophrenia.

Method: In this 6-week, double-blind, fixed-dose study, patients with schizophrenia (DSM-IV diagnosis) are randomly assigned to amisulpride (800 mg/d) or amisulpride (400 mg/d) plus sulpiride (800 mg/d). The hypothesis is that the two treatment groups have the similar efficacy and safety, but different cost. The efficacy assessment was the change from baseline in the score on the Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S), Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and subscales (positive scale, negative scale, general psychopathology scale), Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS), and Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF). Safety assessments include the change from baseline on Simpson-Angus Rating Scale (SAS), Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS), Barnes Akathisia Scale (BAS), and UKU Side-effects Rating Scale (UKU), and the change from baseline in prolactin levels, body weight, vital sign, blood pressure, AC glucose level, and lipid profiles(cholesterol, high density lipid protein [HDL], low density lipid protein [LDL], and triglyceride [TG]).

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Double (Participant, Investigator)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 55 Years(Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • schizophrenia
  • washout of antipsychotics at least 3-5 days
  • written informed consents

排除标准

  • History of serious adverse events to sulpiride or amisulpride
  • History of neuroleptic malignant syndrome or tardive dyskinesia to antipsychotics
  • treatment-resistant schizophrenia
  • long-acting antipsychotics in the past 3 months
  • comorbid with substance abuse/dependence
  • female subjects with pregnancy
  • severe physical illness

研究组 & 干预措施

sulpiride plus amisulpride

Experimental

sulpiride 800mg/d + amisulpride 400mg/d

干预措施: full-dose amisulpride (Drug)

full-dose amisulpride

Active Comparator

amisulpride 800mg/d

干预措施: full-dose amisulpride (Drug)

结局指标

主要结局

change from baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total scores

时间窗: The PANSS was rated at baseline, and again at weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 (or on early termination).

次要结局

  • changes from baseline in the scores on several psychopathology scales for efficacy(The CGI-S, PANSS, CDSS, and GAF were rated at baseline, and again at weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 (or on early termination).)
  • Assessments of safety for general adverse events(UKU was administered at baseline and at weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 (or on early termination))
  • Assessments of safety for extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS)(AIMS, BAS, and SAS were administered at baseline and at weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 (or on early termination))
  • Assessments of quality of life(Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 was assessed at baseline and week 6)
  • Other safety of clinical trial(Body weight, BMI, pulse rate, and blood pressure were checked at baseline and at weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 (or on early termination). ECG and laboratory tests were assessed at baseline and week 6.)

研究者

申办方类型
Other Gov
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Ching-Hua Lin, MD, PhD

Chief of Adult Psychiatry

Kaohsiung Kai-Suan Psychiatric Hospital

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验