A Pharmacy Liaison-Patient Navigation Intervention to Reduce Inpatient and Emergency Department Utilization Among Primary Care Patients in a Medicaid Accountable Care Organization: A Pragmatic Trial
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 364
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Acute healthcare utilization composite measure
研究概览
简要总结
This is a pragmatic comparative effectiveness trial (n=364) to compare two screening and referral program models to address health-related social needs (HRSN) among the intermediate risk population of Boston Accountable Care Organization (BACO), a Medicaid ACO. The first study arm is THRIVE-Basic, the low-touch usual care model already implemented in all primary care clinics at Boston Medical Center (BMC) where patients are screened for HRSN and receive a printed paper resource referral guide. The second study arm is THRIVE+, which enhances the THRIVE-Basic model by engaging a pharmacy liaison-patient navigator to provide targeted navigation services and motivational interviewing to ensure connection to hospital- and community-based resources. The patient navigators will also interface directly with a partner community organization, Action for Boston Community Development (ABCD), to further help connect patients receiving THRIVE+ to community resources for HRSN. All patients in our study will receive pharmacy services via an existing Pharmacy Care Program. Patients in study arm 1 will be connected to a pharmacy liaison, which is standard clinical practice for intermediate risk ACO members in the BMC General Internal Medicine clinics. Patients in study arm 2 will receive systematic screening for and addressing of HRSN (THRIVE+) via a pharmacy liaison-patient navigator (a pharmacy technician trained as a patient navigator to deploy both pharmacy services and the THRIVE+ intervention), thereby avoiding duplication of services and multiple touches. Assignment to the study arms will be linked to existing Pharmacy Care Program enrollment activities and will be based on medical record number. The investigators' rationale for the study is that if patients' HRSN are addressed, patients will be better positioned to manage chronic conditions, adhere to preventive care plans, and less likely to use the emergency department (a conduit to inpatient care) for ambulatory care-sensitive conditions. The effectiveness of these two models will be compared with respect to alleviating HRSN and reducing acute health care utilization over a 12-month follow-up period.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Non Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Health Services Research
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 64 Years(Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •Identified as within the 3rd to 10th percentile for healthcare utilization and cost among Boston Accountable Care Organization (BACO) Medicaid ACO membership at the time of enrollment in the clinical program; and
- •Attend a primary care visit with a primary care provider (PCP-nurse practitioner or physician) in General Internal Medicine at Boston University Medical Center.
排除标准
- •Patients who are receiving services from the BACO complex care management program.
结局指标
主要结局
Acute healthcare utilization composite measure
时间窗: 12 months
Measure includes all-cause hospital admissions and all-cause emergency department visits.
次要结局
- Number of 30-day emergency department revisits(12 months)
- Number of all-cause emergency department visits(12 months)
- Emergency department revisits rate(12 months)
- Number of 30-day hospital readmissions(12 months)
- Number of all-cause hospital discharges(12 months)
- 30-day inpatient readmission rate(12 months)
