跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04802681
NCT04802681已完成4 期

Piezo-electric Versus Open Wire Pressure Guidewires for FFR Measurements: Comparison of Two Commercially Available Pressure Wires

Lokien van Nunen2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 50 人开始时间: 2021年12月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
4 期
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
50
试验地点
2
主要终点
FFR

研究概览

简要总结

Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is the current gold standard for correct decision making with respect to revascularization in the catheterization laboratory. FFR is measured by using a pressure guidewire equipped with a pressure sensor, positioned distal to the stenosis under investigation. A newly developed pressure wire using open wire technology has recently become commercially available. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether the Wirecath pressure guidewire can be used as standard pressure guidewire.

The effectiveness of the device will be investigated by comparing Wirecath FFR measurements with the measurements of another regular sensor-tipped pressure guidewires during simultaneous FFR measurements in the same vessel.

详细描述

FFR is a lesion-specific pressure-derived index of functional severity, defined as the maximum myocardial blood flow in the presence of an epicardial stenosis compared with the maximum flow in the hypothetical absence of the stenosis. FFR is measured by advancing a pressure guidewire into the coronary artery distal to the lesion under investigation and maintained in that position. Distal coronary pressure (Pd) and aortic pressure (Pa) are measured simultaneously while inducing steady state maximum hyperemia. FFR is defined as the lowest value of Pd/Pa achieved during maximum hyperemia. An FFR value = or < 0.80 indicates the presence of myocardial ischemia and indicates PCI is warranted.

Existing 0.014" wires with pressure measurement capabilities have been available for more than 20 years. Improvements have been done over time, but they are still regarded as inferior to ordinary guidewires when it comes to maneuverability and general guidewire properties. This is attributed to the microelectronics that are needed to facilitate the pressure measurements in these wires. These existing wires also have issues with signal stability which is often referred to as 'drift'. Drift is an electronical phenomenon that leads to a slow progressive change in the pressure value over time. a not entirely reliable signal quality.

A relatively new pressure guidewire, Wirecath, is an equivalent device to the currently commercially available pressure guidewires. In comparative bench tests it has shown very good maneuverability. Moreover due to the 'open wire' technology (and thus lack of microelectronics throughout the wire), the Wirecath has very stable signal properties and is, according to physical law and bench testing, immune against a hydrostatic error and less affected by drifting of the signal, which are limitations with current pressure guidewires.

This study is designed to examine and compare the pressure measurements of two commercially available pressure guidewires (Abbott and Cavis Technologies) by simultaneously measuring FFR in the same coronary artery with two different pressure guidewires.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Na
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Diagnostic
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 80 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Age 18-80 years
  • Scheduled to undergo invasive FFR measurement
  • Coronary artery lesions located in the proximal or mid part of the coronary artery
  • Reference diameter of at least 2.0mm

排除标准

  • Severe aortic valve stenosis
  • known conduction disturbances (second- or third-degree AV block)
  • acute myocardial infarction (CK >1,000 U/L less than 5 days ago)
  • bradycardia (less than 45 beats/min)
  • severe hypotension
  • extremely tortuous or calcified coronary arteries precluding FFR measurement
  • history of severe asthma
  • pregnancy
  • inability to provide informed consent.

结局指标

主要结局

FFR

时间窗: During catheterization

To compare the pressure signals measured by the different available pressure guidewires, specifically the FFR value

Hydrostatic error

时间窗: During catheterization

To assess the occurrence of hydrostatic errors when using sensor-tipped wires

Drift

时间窗: During catheterization

To assess the occurrence of drift between the different pressure guidewires

次要结局

  • Maneuverability(During catheterization)
  • Signal quality(During catheterization)

研究者

发起方
Lokien van Nunen
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor Investigator
主要研究者

Lokien van Nunen

Fellow Interventional Cardiology

Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验