跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02272062
NCT02272062已完成不适用

Patient-Reported Preferences Affecting Revascularization Decisions

Duke University2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 203 人开始时间: 2014年11月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
203
试验地点
2
主要终点
Concordance of patient preference with delivered treatment

研究概览

简要总结

Selection of a treatment strategy for patients with symptoms due to coronary artery disease requires consideration of patient preferences. In current clinical practice, patient preferences for treatment may not be known prior to diagnostic coronary angiography. The investigators will test an internet-based shared decision-making tool which will provide education and solicit preference information prior to angiography. The investigators seek to determine if this tool can accurately assess patient preferences, and if these preferences will lead to a change in clinical management.

详细描述

Selecting a treatment strategy for patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease (CAD) requires integrated consideration of symptom burden, patient preferences, and practice guidelines. In many clinical scenarios, there is equipoise regarding the need to revascularize (percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs. medical management) and/or the type of revascularization (PCI vs. bypass surgery). Patients may have minimal direct input in the decision to proceed to a revascularization procedure, especially in the case of ad hoc PCI.

There is little guidance in the literature regarding strategies to improve patient participation in revascularization decisions. There is no shared decision-making tool to provide accessible information to the interventional cardiologist prior to PCI. An educational program that provides basic information regarding CAD and revascularization procedures could lead to improved patient knowledge and informed participation in these critical decisions. A clinical survey that assesses patient symptom burden and preferences could provide valuable information to physicians at the time of angiography. The investigators aim to test a clinical tool that addresses both of these needs and can be administered in the pre-procedure area immediately prior to angiography. If successful, this tool could lead to greater informed patient participation in revascularization procedures and improved patient satisfaction.

First, the investigators will conduct a pre-post analysis. The first 100 enrolled patients will undergo usual care without the use of the decision-making tool. Surveys prior to angiography and at 3 months will test knowledge and decisional self-efficacy. Subsequently, 200 patients will utilize the decision-making tool and will complete the same surveys. Comparison of these groups will test the ability of the decision-making tool to improve knowledge about CAD and accurately assess preferences.

Among the 200 patients utilizing the decision-making tool, patients will be randomly assigned to have, or not have, their preferences shared with the interventional cardiologist at the time of catheterization. This randomized portion of the study will test the impact of patient preferences on treatment decisions.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients referred to the catheterization laboratory for diagnostic coronary angiography with a reasonable expectation of coronary artery disease, defined as chronic stable angina, chest pain with a positive functional study, unstable angina, or non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction.

排除标准

  • Unable to provide informed consent
  • Unable to speak or read English
  • Critical illness
  • When a delay in angiography to administer the decision aid could lead to adverse clinical outcome

结局指标

主要结局

Concordance of patient preference with delivered treatment

时间窗: 3 months

Among patients with significant coronary artery disease on diagnostic angiography, the percentage of subjects with delivered therapy (medical management, percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass graft) identical to preferences expressed prior to angiography.

次要结局

  • Angina(3 months)
  • Knowledge(3 months)
  • Decisional conflict(Within 2 hours of angiography)
  • Patient satisfaction(3 months)
  • Informed values congruence(Within 2 hours of angiography)
  • Ad hoc percutaneous coronary intervention(3 months)

研究者

发起方
Duke University
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验