跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01691586
NCT01691586已完成不适用

Remote Monitoring of Heart Failure Patients With Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device: The Patient Perspective

UMC Utrecht1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 600 人开始时间: 2013年4月13日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
UMC Utrecht
入组人数
600
试验地点
1
主要终点
Patient-reported health status

研究概览

简要总结

A relatively new and promising development in the area of cardiovascular implantable electronic device therapy is remote patient monitoring (RPM). RPM systems can interrogate the device automatically and send the data from the patients' home to the physician, thereby reducing in-clinic follow-ups.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of RPM + in-clinic follow-up versus in-clinic follow-up only on patient-reported health status and device-acceptance after implantation with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) or cardiac resynchronization defibrillator (CRT-D).

Secondary objectives are (1) to identify subgroups of patients who prefer RPM over in-clinic visits or vice versa due to specific clinical and psychological factors and (2) To investigate the cost-effectiveness of RPM + in-clinic follow-up compared to in-clinic follow-up only.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Supportive Care
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 85 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • first time ICD/CRT-D implanted at one of the participating centers
  • left ventricular ejection fraction <35%
  • NYHA functional class II or III symptoms
  • ICD/CRT-D device compatible with the LATITUDE(r) RPM system from Boston Scientific

排除标准

  • On the waiting list for heart transplantation
  • History of psychiatric illness others than affective/anxiety disorders
  • Cognitive impairments
  • Insufficient knowledge of the language to fill in the questionnaires

结局指标

主要结局

Patient-reported health status

时间窗: 24 months

23-item Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)

Patient-reported device acceptance

时间窗: 24 months

12-item Florida Patient Acceptance Scale (FPAS)

次要结局

  • Cost-effectiveness(24 months)
  • Patient-reported satisfaction with care(24 months)

研究者

发起方
UMC Utrecht
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

M. Meine

Principal Investigator

UMC Utrecht

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验