跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06793969
NCT06793969招募中不适用

Swartz Sheath With Angioplasty Guidewire-Assisted Versus Conventional Technique for Patent Foramen Ovale Closure: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

RenJi Hospital1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 120 人开始时间: 2023年12月24日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
入组人数
120
试验地点
1
主要终点
Time of PFO tunnel passage

研究概览

简要总结

The technical challenge in patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure lies in successfully establishing an occlusion pathway through the PFO tunnel using a guidewire or catheter. In this study, we aim to investigate the efficacy and safety of Swartz sheath with angioplasty guidewire-assisted technique for PFO Closure.

详细描述

In cases of complex PFO, failure of guidewire passage through the septum can occur, rendering closure impossible. The present multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel Swartz sheath with angioplasty guidewire-assisted technique to facilitate PFO tunnel passage.

With written consent, the investigators expect to enrol PFO patients with a history of cryptogenic stroke (CS) or transient ischemic attack (TIA), who requires PFO closure according to current guidelines. A standardized TEE protocol is used to assess the morphologic characteristics of the atrial septum and right-to-left shunting through PFO. Eligible patients are prospectively and randomly assigned to the Swartz sheath + angioplasty guidewire group or the conventional group (1:1 ratio). In the Swartz sheath + angioplasty guidewire group, the PFO closure procedure is performed with Swartz sheath + angioplasty guidewire assistance. In the conventional group, the PFO closure procedure is performed with a multi-functional catheter. After the procedure, safety parameters such as contrast use, procedure time, and severe complications are recorded. All patients are followed up at 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12- month post device implantation. The presence of a residual shunt, device embolization, device migration and residual shunt are recorded.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single (Participant)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 65 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •Aged between 18 and 65
  • •Confirmed diagnosis of PFO by transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography
  • •A history of cryptogenic stroke (CS) or transient ischemic attack (TIA)

排除标准

  • •Confirmed pregnancy
  • •Confirmed diagnosis of intracardiac thrombosis
  • •Confirmed diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension
  • •Confirmed diagnosis of rheumatic heart disease, or valvular heart disease
  • •Past medical history of myocardial infarction, unstable angina and intracranial hemorrhage

研究组 & 干预措施

The conventional group

Sham Comparator

In the conventional group, the PFO closure procedure is performed with a multi-functional catheter and guided by intraprocedural fluoroscopy and intracardiac echocardiography (ICE).

干预措施: Conventional technique to pass the PFO tunnel (Procedure)

The Swartz sheath + angioplasty guidewire group

Active Comparator

In the Swartz sheath + angioplasty guidewire group, the PFO closure procedure is performed with Swartz sheath + angioplasty guidewire assistance and guided by intraprocedural fluoroscopy and ICE.

干预措施: Swartz sheath with Angioplasty Guidewire-Assisted Technique for PFO tunnel passage (Procedure)

结局指标

主要结局

Time of PFO tunnel passage

时间窗: Intraprocedural assessment (measured in minutes )

The total time required to pass the guide across PFO tunnel

次要结局

  • Procedural Complications(Intraprocedural assessment)
  • Procedure Time(Intraprocedural assessment (measured in minutes ))
  • Fluoroscopy Time(Intraprocedural assessment (measured in minutes ))
  • Radiation Dose(Intraprocedural assessment (measured in mGys))

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验