Effect and Cost-effectiveness of a Physiotherapy-led Care Model for Patients Referred to an Emergency Department Due to Musculoskeletal Injuries: A Multicentre Quasi-randomized Clinical Trial
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 招募中
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 800
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Brief pain inventory short form
研究概览
简要总结
Both in Denmark and internationally, emergency departments have been overwhelmed for several years by a growing number of patients, combined with a shortage of doctors and nurses. This problem is expected to continue because the number of elderly people with multiple health problems is increasing. To keep providing good quality care in emergency departments, we need to consider new ways of organizing treatment.
In Canada, Australia, and the UK, some hospitals have tried a model where specially trained physiotherapists examine and treat patients who come in with muscle and joint injuries and pain. Since these patients make up about 25% of all those referred to emergency departments, this model could help take some pressure off doctors and nurses. That way, doctors and nurses can spend more time caring for seriously ill patients who need urgent help.
Several studies on these physiotherapist-led models show benefits for both patients and the healthcare system. Patients report being more satisfied and better informed about their injury and treatment. They wait less, have fewer unnecessary tests, and need fewer repeat visits to the emergency department.
However, similar studies have never been done in Scandinavia, even though some Danish emergency departments have tested similar models. Healthcare systems and the education of physiotherapists differ between Scandinavian countries and the countries mentioned above. So, we don't know if we would see the same benefits here. Also, there has been no research on whether this model is cost-effective, which is important for decision-makers when planning future healthcare budgets.
With this research project, we want to test a model in Danish hospitals where specially trained physiotherapists take care of examining, treating, and discharging patients with muscle and joint pain and injuries. We will look at how this model affects patient experiences (like pain and satisfaction) and clinical outcomes (like repeat emergency visits and use of imaging tests), compared to the usual practice where doctors handle these patients. We will also study whether the model is cost-effective, meaning whether the benefits of using this approach are worth the costs, or even greater than the costs.
The study will be conducted at 4-5 hospitals, where a total of 800 patients with minor musculoskeletal injuries will be included in connection with their visit at the emergency department. Patients will receive questionnaires at 1, 4, 12 and 26 weeks after injury regarding patient reported outcomes. Register data will be retrieved at 26 weeks regarding the patients' health care use during follow-up.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Non Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Health Services Research
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Musculoskeletal pain and injury to the upper or lower extremities
- •Triaged non-urgent (blue) in the emergency department
- •Speaks and understands Danish
排除标准
- •High velocity trauma
- •Cognitively unable to participate
- •Non-malignant conditions (cancer, inflammation, infection)
研究组 & 干预措施
Advanced practice physiotherapy
Advanced practice physiotherapists will independently diagnose, manage and discharge patients
干预措施: Advanced practice physiotherapy (Other)
Usual care
Nurses and physicians in the emergency department will diagnose, manage and discharge patients as per usual care
干预措施: Usual Care (Other)
结局指标
主要结局
Brief pain inventory short form
时间窗: From baseline (time of injury) to 12 weeks follow-up
BPI short form is a self-reported questionnaire, using the 7 items pain interference on functional ability, mood, sleep and work. The patient completes the assessment at baseline, 1, 4, 12 and 26 weeks after injury
Euroqol 5 Dimensions 5 Levels
时间窗: From baseline to 26 weeks
The EQ5D assesses health-related quality of life using 5 items. It is used as the primary outcome for qualculation of QUALYs in the health economic analysis.
次要结局
- Visit-specific satisfaction questionnaire(Is collected at week 1 after baseline)
- PROMIS short form physical function(From baseline to 12 weeks after.)
- PROMIS short form upper extremety(From baseline to 12 weeks)
- Work Productivity and Activity Impairment(From baseline to 12 weeks)
- Return-visits to emergency department(From baseline to 12 week follow-up)
- Health care use in primary care(From baseline to 26 week follow-up)
研究者
Nanna Rolving
Associate professor
Aarhus University Hospital
