Enhancing Resilience And Mental Well-Being Through Breathing Practice For Clinical Care Professionals (Breathing Study-Burnout)
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 招募中
- 发起方
- Mayo Clinic
- 入组人数
- 40
- 试验地点
- 8
- 主要终点
- Assess feasibility of the structured breathing-based intervention among healthcare professionals via ease of recruitment
研究概览
简要总结
The purpose of this study is to assess the immediate and long-term effects of structured breathing on clinical symptoms related to mental health including anxiety, depression, perceived stress, and sleep quality.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Na
- 干预模型
- Single Group
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 85 Years（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •Participants must be healthcare professionals at the above-mentioned 4 MCHS sites (Eau Claire, La Crosse, Mankato, Albert Lea).
- •Must score ≥40 on Copenhagen Burnout Inventory Q1-
- •Participants must be physically fit enough to perform light exercise.
- •Participants should read and understand English well enough to consent, complete measures, and follow instructions.
- •Participants must have access to a smartphone or tablet.
排除标准
- •Active primary psychotic disorder or substance use disorder (except nicotine dependence) within the past year.
- •Severe or unstable medical condition that could interfere with participation or data collection.
- •Active neurological condition (including seizure disorder, traumatic brain injury, or stroke) that could affect cognitive functioning or brain imaging results.
- •Chronic lung disease (e.g., COPD, cystic fibrosis) or aneurysm.
- •Current pregnancy or planning to become pregnant during the study period
研究组 & 干预措施
Breathing Intervention
Engaging in self-guided breathing sessions to improve brain circulation and mental well-being.
干预措施: Structured Breathing (Behavioral)
结局指标
主要结局
Assess feasibility of the structured breathing-based intervention among healthcare professionals via ease of recruitment
时间窗: Enrollment to end of study participation at 4 months.
This outcome measure will assess whether the structured breathing-based intervention is feasible among healthcare professionals via ease of recruitment reported by study staff.
Assess feasibility of the structured breathing-based intervention among healthcare professionals via retention statistics
时间窗: Enrollment to end of study participation at 4 months
This outcome measure will assess the feasibility of the structured breathing-based intervention among healthcare professionals by examining retention rates throughout study duration.
Assess feasibility of structured breathing-based intervention among healthcare professionals via Feasibility of Intervention Measure
时间窗: Enrollment to end of study participation at 4 months
To assess the feasibility of a structured breathing intervention among healthcare professionals using Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM). Feasibility of Intervention Measure is a four-item measure of implementation feasibility with scores ranging from 1-5, with higher scores indicating greater feasibility.
Assess feasibility of the structured breathing-based intervention among healthcare professionals via mobile app engagement metrics
时间窗: Enrollment to end of study participation at 4 months
This outcome measure will assess whether the structured breathing-based intervention is feasible among healthcare professionals by analyzing app usage metrics from participants.
Assess appropriateness of structured breathing-based intervention among healthcare professionals
时间窗: Enrollment to end of study participation at 4 months
To assess the appropriateness of a structured breathing intervention among healthcare professionals using Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM). Intervention Appropriateness Measure is a four-item measure with a scale of responses from 1-5, with higher scores indicating greater appropriateness.
Assess acceptability of structured breathing-based intervention among healthcare professionals
时间窗: From enrollment to the end of study participation at 4 months
To assess the acceptability of a structured breathing intervention among healthcare professionals utilizing the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM). Acceptability of Intervention Measure is a four-item measure with responses from 1-5, with higher scores equating to greater acceptability.
Assess participant satisfaction related to breathing-based intervention
时间窗: Enrollment to end of study participation at 4 months.
Participant satisfaction will be assessed through a mixed-methods approach combining quantitative surveys (exit survey) and qualitative participant interviews (4 month in-person visit/interview).
次要结局
- Evaluate intervention adherence, usability, and engagement metrics via mobile application(Enrollment to end of treatment at 4 months.)
研究者
Pravesh Sharma
Principal Investigator
Mayo Clinic