Efficacy of a Psychologically-Informed Physiotherapy Intervention in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain With a High Level of Psychosocial Factors: a Feasibility and Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial
概览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 干预措施
- Physiotherapy
- 疾病 / 适应症
- Low Back Pain, Recurrent
- 发起方
- Laval University
- 入组人数
- 40
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Physiotherapists adherence to intervention
- 状态
- 已完成
- 最后更新
- 2个月前
概览
简要总结
Low back pain is presently the first cause of disability worldwide. The most recommended interventions by clinical guidelines are exercises and cognitive behavioral therapy although the effect is modest. However, no approach is superior when given to a heterogeneous group of subjects with chronic low back pain (CLBP). This is probably due to the multiple factors associated with CLBP which are biophysical, psychological and social. Thus, each patient presents with a unique profile of factors contributing to their pain and could benefit from an approach tailored to their profile. In other words, it is crucial to identify the right treatment, for the right person, at the right moment. For example, the presence of important psychological factors such as anxiety and depression are risk factors for low back pain to develop and persist over time. The main aim of this project is to determine the feasibility to perform a large clinical trial comparing the efficacy of a two physiotherapy's approaches to treat CLBP (i.e., a psychologically-informed physiotherapy intervention compared to usual physiotherapy) in patients with CLBP presenting a high level of psychological factors.
详细描述
Low back pain is presently the first cause of disability worldwide. The most recommended interventions by clinical guidelines are exercises and cognitive behavioral therapy although the effect is modest. However, no approach is superior when given to a heterogeneous group of subjects with chronic low back pain (CLBP). This is probably due to the multiple factors associated with CLBP which are biophysical, psychological and social. Thus, each patient presents with a unique profile of factors contributing to their pain and could benefit from an approach tailored to their profile. In other words, it is crucial to identify the right treatment, for the right person, at the right moment. For example, the presence of important psychological factors such as anxiety and depression are risk factors for low back pain to develop and persist over time. Empowerment of physiotherapists and patients on the optimal management of psychosocial factors, in addition of the usual care delivered in physiotherapy, may be a potent strategy to improve the treatment effect especially with patients presenting a complex clinical profile. This empowerment may be done through psychologically-informed physiotherapy, an approach incorporating strategies from cognitive behavioral therapy into the physiotherapy usual practice. However, the feasibility to perform a clinical trial including psychologically-informed physiotherapy in the context of the Quebec's healthcare system remains to be verified. The main aim of this project is to determine the feasibility to perform a pilot randomised controlled trial testing the efficacy of a psychologically-informed physiotherapy intervention in CLBP patients with a high level of psychosocial factors compared to usual physiotherapy. Specific aims are related to feasibility (1) and sample size estimation (2): 1. To test (a) strategies to recruit participants with high level of psychosocial factors and physiotherapists (PT) (recruitment rate and retention), (b) the physiotherapists and participants adherence to intervention, (c) the risk of contamination between treatment sites and (d) specific challenges; 2. To gather data to estimate the required sample size for a future full-scale randomized clinical trial using physical functioning as main outcome, and pain intensity, quality of life, fear of movement, catastrophizing, self-efficacy, pain pressure threshold, exercise-induced hypoalgesia and temporal summation as additional outcomes. The hypothesis is that this project will be feasible in terms of recruitment for both patients (\~30) and PT (6-8), will show good patients and physiotherapists' adherence to intervention and low contamination between treatment sites. An improvement for all pain-related outcomes in both groups, but more in the psychologically-informed physiotherapy group, is also expected.
研究者
Hugo Massé-Alarie
Principal Investigator
Laval University
入排标准
入选标准
- •Non-specific chronic low back pain (\> 3 months)
- •High level of psychosocial factors (a high level using the Start Back Screening Tool, i.e., cut-off of at least 4 points (total score) and at least 4 points (sub-score with questions 5 to 9)).
排除标准
- •Non-musculoskeletal conditions causing low back pain (e.g., neoplasia, infection)
- •Neuropathic conditions (e.g., radiculopathy).
- •Currently in litigation with paying agencies
研究组 & 干预措施
Usual care in physiotherapy
The usual care group will receive interventions recommended by clinical guidelines: education on the nature of LBP, advice to stay active and to continue usual activities, specific exercise programs combined with orthopedic manual therapy.
干预措施: Physiotherapy
Psychologically-informed physiotherapy intervention
The psychologically-informed physiotherapy group will receive the control intervention enhanced with specific interventions targeting psychosocial factors (e.g., positive reinforcement, mindfulness-based stress reduction, diaphragmatic breathing, graded exposure). Most of these techniques are efficient to mitigate the impact of psychological factors such as anxiety and fear of movement. To standardize the psychologically-informed physiotherapy approach, physiotherapists will receive a two-day training course by a physiotherapist expert with this approach in chronic pain conditions (Alain Gaumond).
干预措施: Physiotherapy
结局指标
主要结局
Physiotherapists adherence to intervention
时间窗: Week 6
Physiotherapists will complete a list of interventions used after each interventions (8 interventions on period of 6 weeks).
Retention of participants
时间窗: Baseline, when a participant drop out
The number of participants who completed the study divided by the number of participants that were recruited.
Recruitment rate of participants
时间窗: Baseline
The number of participants contacted divided by the number of participants recruited.
Risk of contamination between treatment sites
时间窗: Week 6
The list of interventions used by physiotherapists at each site will be compared to evaluate the risk of contamination between treatment sites.
Participants adherence to intervention
时间窗: Week 6
Participants will measure their adherence to intervention on a Numeric Rating Scale from 0 (not adherent at all) to 10 (completely adherent).
Specific challenges
时间窗: Through data collection completion, an average of 1 year
Using semi-structured interview with the physio.
次要结局
- Central Sensitization (CSI)(Baseline, Weeks 6, 12 and 24)
- Temporal summation(Baseline, Week 6)
- Self-efficacy (CPSES)(Baseline, Weeks 6, 12 and 24)
- Pain intensity (NRS)(Baseline, Weeks 6, 12 and 24)
- Fear of movement (TSK-11)(Baseline, Weeks 6, 12 and 24)
- Physical functioning (ODI)(Baseline, Weeks 6, 12 and 24)
- Catastrophizing thoughts (PCS)(Baseline, Weeks 6, 12 and 24)
- Participant's expectations(Baseline, Weeks 6, 12 and 24)
- Pain pressure threshold(Baseline, Week 6)
- Quality of life (SF-12)(Baseline, Weeks 6, 12 and 24)
- Global rating of change (GRC)(Baseline, Weeks 6, 12 and 24)