Fluid Optimisation in Laparoscopic Colorectal Procedures
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 60
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Duration of hospitalisation
研究概览
简要总结
Goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) with hemodynamic monitoring may not be of benefit to all elective patients undergoing major abdominal surgery, particularly those managed in Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols (ERAS) setting.
详细描述
Our study compared two groups of patients undergoing elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a control group (CG) in which standard haemodynamic monitoring was used, and a study group (SG) in which extended haemodynamic monitoring was applied with appropriate intraoperative interventions. Differences in intraoperative fluid management, hospital stay, and postoperative morbidity were observed.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •patients, undergoing elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery
排除标准
- •Patients with cardiac arrhythmias
研究组 & 干预措施
Control group
Standard perioperative anesthesia management
Study group
Perioperative extended haemodynamic monitoring of fluid loading, cardiac output and changes of peripheral vascular resistance by analysing the arterial curve was provided by non-invasive haemodynamic monitoring (LIDCO Rapid, Lidco Ltd., United Kingdom).In SG fluid optimisation was performed before pneumoperitoneum and after abdominal desuflation with actions to achieved CI, MAP and SI within 80% of baseline values.
干预措施: Perioperative fluid optimisation (Procedure)
结局指标
主要结局
Duration of hospitalisation
时间窗: 1 month after admission
次要结局
- Perioperative complications(8 days after surgery)
研究者
Alenka Spindler-Vesel
asist prof
University Medical Centre Ljubljana