跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04005001
NCT04005001Unknown2 期

Using Clinical Treatment Data in a Machine Learning Approach for Sepsis Detection

Dascena6 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 37,986 人开始时间: 2021年9月25日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
2 期
发起方
入组人数
37,986
试验地点
6
主要终点
Rate of reduction in false alerts

研究概览

简要总结

Machine learning is a powerful method to create clinical decision support (CDS) tools, when training labels reflect the desired alert behavior. In our Phase I work for this project, we developed HindSight, an encoding software that was designed to examine discharged patients' electronic health records (EHRs), identify clinicians' sepsis treatment decisions and patient outcomes, and pass those labeled outcomes and treatment decisions to an online algorithm for retraining of our machine-learning-based CDS tool for real-time sepsis alert notification, InSight. HindSight improved the performance of InSight sepsis alerts in retrospective work. In this study, we propose to assess the clinical utility of HindSight by conducting a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) for more accurate sepsis alerts.

详细描述

We will evaluate the performance of HindSight in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). HindSight is a novel encoding software designed to optimize alerts for sepsis alert notification. HindSight identifies clinicians' sepsis-related decisions in the electronic health records of former patients and passes those events to InSight, thus supplying InSight with labeled examples of true positive sepsis cases for retraining. In our retrospective work, we have shown that HindSight enables InSight to adapt to site-specific deviations of real-world clinical deployment by successfully reducing false and irrelevant alarms, without human supervision. The goal of this project is to demonstrate that the retrospective success of HindSight can be successfully translated to live clinical environments. In our Phase I work, HindSight achieved an area under the receiver-operating characteristic (AUROC) of 0.899, 0.831 and 0.877 for clinician sepsis evaluation, treatment, and onset, respectively. By using an online learning algorithm to incorporate HindSight-labeled data into the InSight predictor, we showed that the online-trained InSight can adapt to the HindSight-labeled data and outperform both baseline and periodically re-trained versions of InSight (p < 0.05). In Aim 1, we will prospectively validate HindSight's performance on real-time patient data streams in three diverse hospitals non-interventionally. In Aim 2, we will evaluate the effect of the tool in a prospective, interventional RCT. HindSight will first be evaluated by live deployment at four academic and community hospitals, during which time it will not provide alerts of future sepsis onset. Following any necessary algorithm optimization arising from live hospital validation, we will perform an RCT to evaluate reductions in false alerts from InSight trained on HindSight sepsis labels (experimental arm), compared to InSight trained on gold standard Sepsis-3 labels (control arm).

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Other
盲法
Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • During the study period, all patients over the age of 18 presenting to the emergency department or admitted to an inpatient unit at the participating facilities will automatically be enrolled in the study, until the enrollment target for the study is met

排除标准

  • Patients under the age of 18
  • Prisoners

结局指标

主要结局

Rate of reduction in false alerts

时间窗: Through study completion, human subjects involvement will occur for an average of eight months

The primary outcome measure of interest will be false alert reduction. Successful completion of Aim 1 will be demonstrated by a positive predictive value (PPV) in a live clinical setting for which the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval meets or exceeds the benchmark from prior retrospective studies. Meeting the retrospective PPV benchmark indicates that prospective CDS quality reflects retrospective CDS quality, and is sufficiently high to reduce alarm fatigue and improve clinical utility. Success of Aim 2 is contingent upon achieving a 15% relative reduction in false alerts when comparing between the two treatment arms (p \< 0.05; Fisher's Exact Test).

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
Dascena
申办方类型
Industry
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (6)

Loading locations...

相似试验