跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05017129
NCT05017129已完成不适用

E-training of Inmate Peer Caregivers for Enhancing Geriatric and End-of-life Care in Prisons - Phase II

Klein Buendel, Inc.2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 83 人开始时间: 2020年6月15日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
83
试验地点
2
主要终点
Knowledge Acquisition

研究概览

简要总结

The demographics of the U.S. prison population are shifting at a dramatic rate requiring new approaches to prison healthcare. Current estimates suggest that there are 2.3 million incarcerated persons in the U.S. Similar to the free world, the aging of the Baby Boom generation is occurring in prisons. Notably, inmates 50 and older constitute over 20% of prisoners in state or federal facilities. From 1996-2016, there was an 280% growth in the number of state and federal prisoners age 55 or older, which is in sharp contrast to younger inmates that grew by only 3% during this time period. A surge in older adult offenders in the U.S. has not occurred but rather statutes now impose stiffer sentences, resulting in longer periods of incarceration, such as life without parole or 20+ years. At the same time, early release policies remain restrictive. As a result, sentenced offenders are living through middle and older adulthood within the confines of prisons.

详细描述

There are over 1,719 United States (US) state and federal prisons with over 2.3 million prisoners. In 2017, more than 20% of sentenced prisoners were age 50 or older. The health status of older inmates is often parallel with free-living people who are far older (e.g., 10-15 years). Older prisoners disproportionately contribute to the steeply rising correctional healthcare costs and their death rate is 10 times that of younger prisoners. Corrections budgets are stretched as they strive to meet the care needs of aged and dying prisoners. Carefully selected and vetted inmates offer an abundant human resource that is poised to contribute in important ways to augment prison staff in meeting growing care needs of older and dying inmates. However, the lack of standardized, evidence-based, training that is geared toward this target audience is a current barrier to ensuring high quality inmate caregiving. In response to this need, our Phase I project E-training of Inmate Peer Caregivers for Enhancing Geriatric and End-of-Life Care in Prisons demonstrated that inmate access to technology is growing and inmates can be successful e-learners. Specifically, we learned: (1) there is a need and interest for products such as our Inmates Care computer-based learning (CBL); (2) trainings should be engaging, interactive, and contextually sensitive to the specific environment, target user, and security constraints, while at the same time being mindful of emerging trends in regard to technology use by inmates (e.g., availability of tablets for purchase and use in many states); and finally, (3) that interactive, media-rich prototype modules with high acceptability and usability could be developed. The specifications document and commercialization plan indicated it is possible to develop a full-scale Inmates Care learning system in Phase II and a Technology Niche Analyses® revealed market potential exists. The purpose of this Phase II application is to continue research and development of the Inmates Care learning system with an emphasis on developing a scalable unit for commercialization and testing scale-up in a larger number of more diverse state prisons. More specifically, the aims of this Phase II study are to: 1) Develop a full scale media-rich interactive computer-based learning system Inmates Care, that consists of six modules aimed at augmenting the highly variable face-to-face inmate caregiving programs in state prisons with standardized, evidence-based training to prepare inmates in assisting with end-of-life (EOL) and geriatric care; and one Training Overview and Rollout module that prepares staff to use Inmates Care as a tool for inmate peer caregiver training; 2) Conduct in-person usability testing of the full-scale Inmates Care program in two rounds in state prisons to evaluate logistics, inmate and staff impressions, user interface, ease of use, and perceived barriers in order to optimize the scalable unit for broader dissemination (n=30); and 3) Test scale-up of the full-scale Inmates Care program in state prisons across the nation to evaluate knowledge acquisition outcomes, usage patterns, and commercialization opportunities (n=288).

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Na
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Health Services Research
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Inmate Peer Caregivers:
  • providing geriatric and/or EOL care at participating state prison (Aims 1 and 2 only);
  • able to speak and understand English; and
  • able to consent.

排除标准

  • Under the age of 18
  • Unable to speak and understand English
  • Prison Staff:
  • Inclusion Criteria:
  • able to speak and understand English;
  • able to consent; and
  • have been exposed to inmate peer caregiving (e.g., through training them, oversight of a peer caregiving program, or working with inmate peer caregivers in the infirmary, personal care, or hospice area of prisons)
  • Exclusion Criteria:
  • Under the age of 18
  • Unable to speak and understand English

结局指标

主要结局

Knowledge Acquisition

时间窗: Pre-test (prior to online training- Total Score)

There are no existing measures to evaluate improvements in knowledge among inmates and staff for geriatric and EOL care of inmates. Therefore, the primary outcome measure will be developed for this project. Scale development and psychometric properties will be evaluated (e.g., content-validity, criterion-related validity, construct validity, and internal consistency) using: (1) domain identification and item generation; (2) content expert validation, and (3) pilot test.

Inmates Program Findings

时间窗: Post-test (immediately following online training) approximately one hour

Evaluate improvements in knowledge among inmates

Small-Scale Virtual Usability Testing - SUS Survey (System Usability Test)

时间窗: Immediate post small-scale usability testing

Small-scale virtual usability testing participants were asked to complete the 10-item System Usability Test. The SUS, an industry-standard, assesses usability, including satisfaction, functionality, ease of use, and design. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (Strongly Disagree) to 4 (Strongly Agree) and were summed and multiplied by 2.5 to compute a total scale score. The minimum value is 0 and the maximum value is 100. The means of the Likert response items are calculated to determine the SUS score. The range of scores on the System Usability Scale (SUS) is 0-100. A score of 68 or greater reflects above average usability. Higher scores reflect greater usability.

Large-Scale Usability Testing - SUS Survey (System Usability Test)

时间窗: Immediate post large-scale usability testing

Large-scale testing participants were asked to complete the 10-item System Usability Test. The SUS, an industry-standard, assesses usability, including satisfaction, functionality, ease of use, and design. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (Strongly Disagree) to 4 (Strongly Agree) and were summed and multiplied by 2.5 to compute a total scale score. The minimum value is 0 and the maximum value is 100. The means of the Likert response items are calculated to determine the SUS score. The range of scores on the System Usability Scale (SUS) is 0-100. A score of 68 or greater reflects above average usability. Higher scores reflect greater usability.

次要结局

  • System Usability Scale (SUS)(After small-scale usability testing and at post-test for the large-scale testing. Approximately two hours)
  • Qualitative questions(After small-scale usability testing and at post-test for the large-scale testing. Approximately two hours)

研究者

申办方类型
Industry
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验