Comparison of Combination Olanzapine and Lithium and Combination Chlorpromazine and Lithium in the Treatment of a First Manic Episode With Psychotic Features.
试验速览
- 阶段
- 4 期
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 83
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Intensity of side effects
研究概览
简要总结
Aim: In a population of first episode manic patients with psychotic features, we want to compare the side effect profile, the degree of adherence and the subjective well being, as well as the efficacy of two treatments: The standard treatment currently applied (lithium + chlorpromazine) and an alternative treatment more recently introduced (lithium + olanzapine). In addition, we want to study retrospectively the development of bipolar disorder and study prospectively the 6 and 12-month outcome of a cohort of patients presenting a first manic episode with psychotic features.
Research Background: While the efficacy of lithium in the treatment of acute mania has been established by numerous studies, it is also known that up to 50% of the patients fail to respond when it is prescribed alone. It is therefore common practice to complement the treatment, most commonly with antipsychotics and benzodiazepines. It has been suggested that antipsychotic agents are faster acting and are superior in controlling hyperactivity compared to lithium, whereas mood stabilisation is better achieved by lithium, Typical antipsychotics, such as chlorpromazine, may therefore be useful as adjunctive medication to mood stabilisers, especially within the first few weeks of treatment of acute mania, and for patients exhibiting psychotic symptoms or hyperactivity. They however can induce side effects (somnolence, dizziness, dry mouth, extrapyramidal side effects such as rigidity of the muscles, and possibly tardive dyskinesia (involuntary movements or contraction of muscles), as well as akathysia (sense of restlessness). They finally have been suspected to contribute to the occurrence of post-manic depression. Recent publications in chronic populations have shown that atypical antipsychotics, such as olanzapine, are also an effective adjunctive treatment. Olanzapine has the important advantage to induce a very low incidence of extrapyramidal side effects, including tardive dyskinesia. It can however induce somnolence, dizziness, dry mouth, and rather commonly weight gain. Moreover, some authors have reported that olanzapine might induce mania. Both treatments appear then to have positive effects as well as undesirable side effects. Our project is to compare them. The literature concerning first episode mania is sparse, particularly in the domain of pharmacotherapy. One retrospective study showed that 77% of the patients received antipsychotics at discharge and 25% at 6 months follow-up. No comparison has however been made between typical and atypical antipsychotics, and there are no specific treatment guidelines of first episode mania with psychotic features.
Project Summary: The hypothesis is that olanzapine and chlorpromazine will have a comparable efficacy as adjunctive treatment of the acute manic episode with psychotic features. We however think olanzapine will induce less side effects and will be better accepted by the patients, and therefore that the adherence to the treatment will be better than with chlorpromazine. We finally think the subjective sense of well being will be greater with olanzapine than with chlorpromazine.We will recruit 75 patients at the time of their first admission for mania with psychotic features at EPPIC. After signature of the informed consent, we will perform a baseline assessment first to confirm the diagnosis, and second to evaluate the level of psychopathology. The patients will then be randomly selected to receive either a treatment of lithium and olanzapine or a treatment of lithium and chlorpromazine. By the end of the study there will be 37 patients in each group.The patients will go through a baseline assessment including physical examination and usual laboratory investigation to exclude any physical illness. They will also go through a one-hour assessment of psychopathology. Between day 2 and 3 they will go through 2 hours of interview to reassess diagnosis and personal history. They will thereafter be assessed weekly for eight weeks on various dimensions: evolution of the intensity of the symptoms, appearance of depressive symptoms, occurrence of side effects and degree of adherence to the treatment, in an 1-hour interview. Subjective well being and quality of life will re evaluated at week 4 and 8, adding 45 minutes to the duration of the interview. This is a flexible dose, open trial, which means the doctor in charge of the patient will know which medication is being prescribed, and that he will be allowed to adapt the dosage according to what he feels necessary. This research project will allow us to organise a more specialised clinic for the care of first episode manic patients. We will take this opportunity to study carefully the months preceding the appearance of the first episode in order to try to reconstruct the prodrome of bipolar disorders. We will also, in an extension phase of the study, look at the long term outcome (at 6 and 12 months) of a first episode of mania.
详细描述
This prospective single-centre open trial will compare two groups receiving two different neuroleptics combined with lithium during the first 8 weeks of treatment of a first manic episode. All the patients will also be included in a 6 and 12 months follow-up study and will provide information regarding the prodrome of bipolar illness.
The trial comprises five phases: (1) Recruitment and screening; (2) Baseline assessment; (3) 8 weeks treatment phase; (4) Follow-up.
- Recruitment and screening The Youth Access Team (YAT) assesses all the patients referred to the Early Psychosis Prevention and Intervention Centre (EPPIC) in order to confirm the diagnosis of first psychotic episode. Patients with a clinical presentation compatible with a diagnosis of first episode mania will be presented to the main investigator or to one of the co-investigators for a screening interview. This interview should take place as soon as possible, and not later than 24 hours after admission. During these 24 hours, the patients will be kept under a treatment of benzodiazepine exclusively.
Any patient meeting the inclusion criteria (including a Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) [37] total scores equal or superior to 20) and none of the exclusion criteria at the screening interview will be informed (as well as his/her family) about the study, and they will receive a Patient Information Sheet. A Consent form will be completed if they agree to take part in the study. Patients under section 12 who are unable to give informed consent: these patients will be asked for consent when they are better. The authorised psychiatrist will be able to give consent to treatment on their behalf until they are well. When they are well and are asked to give consent and they do not give consent, all information gathered on this patient will be removed. If the patient declines to consent to the study, she/he will be offered standard clinical care in EPPIC. 2. Baseline assessment Once informed consent will have been given, and provided the YMRS score 24 hours after admission remains greater than 20, patients will be assessed by a research assistant who will be blind to the treatment during the first 8 weeks of the study.
¨ The diagnosis will be based on clinical assessment according to the DSM-IV [38] criteria. It will be confirmed during the first week of the study by results of the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-IV, Patient Version (SCID-P) [38].
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Single
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 15 Years 至 29 Years(Child, Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Male and female patients aged 15 to
- •Experiencing a first episode psychosis.
- •Meet DSM-IV criteria for bipolar either manic or mixed episode, or schizoaffective disorder manic episode.
- •Minimum score of 20 on the YMRS
- •Written informed consent to participation.
排除标准
- •Patients at immediate risk of committing harm to self or others
- •Use of neuroleptics or mood-stabilisers in the two months preceding admission to EPPIC
- •Organic mental disease, including mental retardation
- •History of clinically significant illness (liver or renal insufficiency, significant cardiac, vascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, endocrine, neurological or metabolic disturbances).
- •Clinically relevant biochemical or hematological abnormalities.
- •Pregnant or lactating woman
- •History of epilepsy
- •History of severe drug allergy or hypersensitivity
- •Non fluency in English.
研究组 & 干预措施
Lithium and olanzapine
干预措施: Olanzapine (Drug)
Lithium and olanzapine
干预措施: Lithium (Drug)
Lithium and chlorpormazine
干预措施: Lithium (Drug)
Lithium and chlorpormazine
干预措施: Chlorpromazine (Drug)
结局指标
主要结局
Intensity of side effects
时间窗: 8 weeks
Intensity of side effects
¨The frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events (events that first appear or worsen during the study period) will be compared between both groups.
时间窗: 8 weeks
¨The frequency of side effects as rated with the UKU scale will be compared between both groups.
时间窗: 8 weeks
¨Weight gain will be compared between both groups.
时间窗: 8 weeks
¨Frequency of changes in vital signs and laboratory findings will be compared between both groups.
时间窗: 8 weeks
Subjective well being
时间窗: 8 weeks
¨Total scores on the DAI and the SWN will be compared between both groups.
时间窗: 8 weeks
次要结局
- Response to treatment(8 weeks)
- ¨End point analysis: Mean change in various scales from baseline to week 4 and week 8 will be used to compare the efficacy of the two treatments:(8 weeks)
- ¨Primary efficacy analysis will be assessed by comparing the mean change in theYMRS total score.(8 weeks)
- ¨Secondary efficacy analysis will be assessed by comparing the mean change in CGI-BP total score and in BPRS total score.(8 weeks)
- ¨Response analysis: Response is defined as at least a 50% drop in the total YMRS total score from base line to the 8-weeks end point. Euthymia is defined as a total score on the YMRS of no greater than 12 at end point. The number of patients reaching bot(8 weeks)
- Incidence of depressive episodes(8 weeks)
- ¨A worsening in the HAMD-21 score of at least 3 points will be used as a definition of a clinically detectable worsening in depressive symptoms.(8 weeks)
- Six and 12 months outcome(12 months)
- Definition of recovery:(12 months)
- ¨Syndromic recovery: Eight contiguous weeks [50] during which the patient no longer meets criteria for a manic, mixed, or depressive syndrome. Recovery from each of these syndromes is based on DSM-IV criteria and is operationalised as follows: manic synd(12 months)
- ¨Symptomatic recovery: Eight contiguous weeks [50] during which the patient experiences minimal to no psychiatric symptoms, operationalized as follows: Young Mania Rating Scale total score of 5 or less, Hamilton depression scale total score of 10 or les(12 months)
- ¨Relapse: Relapse is defined as the return of symptoms after a remission of less than 8 weeks.(12 months)
- Adherence(8 weeks)
- ¨Degree of adherence to the treatment as scored on the MARS will be compared between both groups.(8 weeks)
- ¨Recurrence: Recurrence is defined as return of symptoms after recovery.(12 months)
- ¨Functional recovery: Return to premorbid levels of function for at least 8 contiguous weeks [50]. To assess functional recovery, seven of the nine general items from the Premorbid Adjustment Scale are evaluated at the 6 and 12-month follow-up visit for(12 months)
