跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT07251920
NCT07251920已完成3 期

Examination of the Dose-dependent Effects of Isometric Resistance Training on Decreases in Blood Pressure in Pre- and Hypertensive Adults

The University of Northampton2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 30 人开始时间: 2024年2月19日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
3 期
状态
已完成
入组人数
30
试验地点
2
主要终点
Ambulatory blood pressure

研究概览

简要总结

High blood pressure is prevalent in a third of the global population and is a key risk factor for cardiovascular disease, the leading cause of death. one lifestyle change that is recommended to reduce blood pressure is to exercise, typically by performing aerobic exercise, but this is often not well adhered to, given the physical and time demands associated with it. Isometric resistance training has been evidenced as an efficacious method to reduce blood pressure, even when performing four two-minute contractions per day, three days per week at 30% of maximum effort. At present, the dose-response effects have not been examined, which are required to identify the minimal effective dose, which could further reduce the temporal demands of this modality to potentially enhance adhernece even more in time-anxious individuals. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the efficacy of once- twice-, and thrice-weekly isometric resistance training programmes to lower blood pressure,

详细描述

The World Health Organisation have reported hypertension, a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD), strokes and coronary heart disease (CHD), to be near epidemic levels globally with over 30% of the world's population, at this time, suffering from hypertension. Over the past twenty years isometric resistance training (IRT) has been established as one of the best forms of nonpharmacological interventions for the prevention and treatment of hypertension and endorsed by the American College of Cardiology / American Heart Association in their most recent guidelines. Thrice weekly IRT programmes undertaken (4 x 2-minute isometric contractions) at 20-30% of an individual's maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) for a period of 4-10 weeks have demonstrated reductions in clinic resting and ambulatory systolic blood pressure (-4 to -10 mmHg), in both normotensive and hypertensive men and women with no reported difference in the magnitude of these reductions between women and men.

Whilst isometric training has been shown to produce clinically meaningful reductions in blood pressure, utilising the commonly used protocol (4 x 2-min contractions) three-times a week, one of the main barriers to therapeutic exercise interventions is time to undertake the intervention and despite the observed benefits, adherence and compliance tends to be low. Indeed, regular exercise adherence declines over time, with only 50% of individuals continuing with regular exercise within the first twelve months following the completion of a therapeutic treatment, with a lack of perceived time cited as one of the main barriers. With this in mind, it is important to determine the effects of training dose on the changes in blood pressure seen following IRT. To date there is very little research into the effects of IRT dose on resting blood pressure with only one study purposely investigated the area. Whilst to the authors knowledge no studies have investigated the effects of altered training dose on ambulatory or diurnal blood pressure variations. Although three times a week has become the most commonly applied protocol there is no evidence to confirm that it is the most efficacious. As training dose is an important determinant of adaptations to exercise training, and with a lack of time cited as a perceived barrier to undertaking exercise, there is a need to determine the most efficacious training protocol to elicit clinical reductions in blood pressure, including shorter time saving (once or twice weekly) protocols.

Therefore, the study aims are to determine if a reduction in the weekly dose of isometric training, such as a reduction in the number of total contractions and therefore a reduced time commitment (once or twice weekly) would produce a similar hypotensive response to those reported.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 60 Years(Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • not taking anti-hypertensive medication
  • borderlerine hypertensive or hypertensive (systolic blood pressure >139 mmHG, diastolic blood pressure > 89 mmHg

排除标准

  • conditoned to resistance training
  • currently taking anti-hypertensive medication
  • regularly smoke or vape
  • are pregnant

结局指标

主要结局

Ambulatory blood pressure

时间窗: Through study completion (12 weeks)

Blood pressure assessed during a 24-hour window

次要结局

  • Resting blood pressure(Through study completion (12 weeks))

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验