跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT07802054
NCT07802054尚未招募不适用

Messages That Motivate: Communicating Alcohol-Related Breast Cancer Risk to Young Adult Women

Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 900 人开始时间: 2026年10月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
入组人数
900
试验地点
1
主要终点
Message Perceptions

研究概览

简要总结

This is an online cross-sectional experimental survey study examining two cancer communication questions: 1) What features of social media messages communicating the breast cancer risks from alcohol consumption will motivate young adult women to drink less? and 2) Do message features differ in their persuasive effects based on young adult women's alcohol consumption behavior?

详细描述

This is an online cross-sectional experimental study to examine the effects of features of social media messages in young adult women ages 18-25 who drink alcohol based on valid, self-report outcomes. Within the survey, participants will be randomized to view messages in one of nine conditions in a 3x3 factorial design with baseline alcohol consumption as a within-participants factor to test the effects of social media message features (content, persuasive themes) on participant responses. We will also compare the effects of message features for young women who drink within recommended limits (1 drink/day or less on average) and those who exceed recommended drinking limits.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Prevention
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 25 Years(Adult)
性别
Female
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Assigned female at birth
  • Age 18-25
  • Report drinking alcohol at least once in the past 30 days
  • Registered in the United States as a member of the Prolific consumer research platform
  • Willing and able to complete procedures in English

排除标准

  • Assigned male at birth
  • Ages <18 or >25
  • Do not report drinking alcohol at least once in the past 30 days
  • Not registered in the U.S. as a member of the Prolific consumer research platform
  • Not willing or not able to complete procedures

研究组 & 干预措施

Arm 8: Risk and Efficacy + YAW Susceptibility

Experimental

干预措施: Risk Message (Behavioral)

Arm 8: Risk and Efficacy + YAW Susceptibility

Experimental

干预措施: Efficacy Message (Behavioral)

Arm 8: Risk and Efficacy + YAW Susceptibility

Experimental

干预措施: YAW Susceptibility (Behavioral)

Arm 9: Risk and Efficacy + Mechanisms

Experimental

干预措施: Risk Message (Behavioral)

Arm 9: Risk and Efficacy + Mechanisms

Experimental

干预措施: Efficacy Message (Behavioral)

Arm 9: Risk and Efficacy + Mechanisms

Experimental

干预措施: Mechanisms (Behavioral)

Arm 1: Risk Only + Industry Deception

Experimental

干预措施: Risk Message (Behavioral)

Arm 1: Risk Only + Industry Deception

Experimental

干预措施: Industry Deception (Behavioral)

Arm 2: Risk Only + YAW Susceptibility

Experimental

干预措施: Risk Message (Behavioral)

Arm 2: Risk Only + YAW Susceptibility

Experimental

干预措施: YAW Susceptibility (Behavioral)

Arm 3: Risk Only + Mechanisms

Experimental

干预措施: Risk Message (Behavioral)

Arm 3: Risk Only + Mechanisms

Experimental

干预措施: Mechanisms (Behavioral)

Arm 4: Efficacy Only + Industry Deception

Experimental

干预措施: Efficacy Message (Behavioral)

Arm 4: Efficacy Only + Industry Deception

Experimental

干预措施: Industry Deception (Behavioral)

Arm 5: Efficacy Only + YAW Susceptibility

Experimental

干预措施: Efficacy Message (Behavioral)

Arm 5: Efficacy Only + YAW Susceptibility

Experimental

干预措施: YAW Susceptibility (Behavioral)

Arm 6: Efficacy Only + Mechanisms

Experimental

干预措施: Efficacy Message (Behavioral)

Arm 6: Efficacy Only + Mechanisms

Experimental

干预措施: Mechanisms (Behavioral)

Arm 7: Risk and Efficacy + Industry Deception

Experimental

干预措施: Risk Message (Behavioral)

Arm 7: Risk and Efficacy + Industry Deception

Experimental

干预措施: Efficacy Message (Behavioral)

Arm 7: Risk and Efficacy + Industry Deception

Experimental

干预措施: Industry Deception (Behavioral)

结局指标

主要结局

Message Perceptions

时间窗: This assessment is administered immediately after participants view study messages on Day 1

We will assess message perceptions using a valid, reliable measure with six questions about whether participants thought the messages were worth remembering, grabbed their attention, and were informative, powerful, convincing, and meaningful. Responses are on a five-point Likert scale from 1 (Strongly disagree) to 5 (Strongly agree). For all message response outcomes, we will sum and average responses to the items to create message-level scores, then compute means across both messages within each condition for a grand mean. Higher values are considered a better outcome.

Effect Perceptions

时间窗: This assessment is administered immediately after participants view study messages on Day 1

We will capture message effects perceptions using the abbreviated effects perceptions scale. Items include questions about how much the messages made them feel discouraged to drink alcohol, concerned about drinking alcohol, and made them feel that drinking alcohol is unpleasant on a scale from 1 (Strongly disagree) to 5 (Strongly agree). For all message response outcomes, we will sum and average responses to the items to create message-level scores, then compute means across both messages within each condition for a grand mean. Higher values are considered a better outcome.

Emotional Response

时间窗: This assessment is administered immediately after participants view study messages on Day 1

We will capture emotional responses to the messages using a valid, four item scale. Items are "This message made me angry; irritated; aggravated; and annoyed" with responses on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (Not likely at all) to 5 (Extremely likely). For all message response outcomes, we will sum and average responses to the items to create message-level scores, then compute means across both messages within each condition for a grand mean. Higher values are considered a better outcome.

Counter-arguing

时间窗: This assessment is administered immediately after participants view study messages on Day 1

We will capture counter-arguing, a measure of whether participants cognitively refute messages, with a valid, three item scale that captures whether participants criticize messages, think of points that go against messages, and are skeptical of the messages. Responses are on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (Not at all) to 7 (Very much). For all message response outcomes, we will sum and average responses to the items to create message-level scores, then compute means across both messages within each condition for a grand mean. Lower values are considered a better outcome.

Behavioral Intentions

时间窗: This assessment is administered immediately after participants view study messages on Day 1

Intentions to reduce alcohol consumption in the future will also be assessed with a valid, multi-item scale capturing whether participants will avoid drinking alcohol completely, reduce the number of occasions when they drink alcohol, and reduce the amount of alcohol they consume on drinking occasions with a 1 (Definitely Will Not) to 4 (Definitely Will) response scale. For all message response outcomes, we will sum and average responses to the items to create message-level scores, then compute means across both messages within each condition for a grand mean. Higher values are considered a better outcome.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Darren Mays

Professor

Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验