跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02411422
NCT02411422已完成不适用

Comparison of Efficiency Between I-gel-Assisted Blind Intubation and I-gel-assisted Bronchoscopic Intubation During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Randomized Simulation Study

Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 23 人开始时间: 2015年4月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
23
试验地点
2
主要终点
intubation time

研究概览

简要总结

The investigators will compare conventional intubation using Macintosh laryngoscope, blind endotracheal intubation using i-gel for conduit and bronchoscopic intubation using Ambu-aScope and i-gel. All situation assumed as cardiac arrest. i.e, someone give chest compressions continuously without interruption.

Moreover the investigators will compare the type of endotracheal tube. Reinforced tube has more soft tube tip, so the investigators think it is more acceptable for intubation using i-gel as conduit.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Crossover
主要目的
Supportive Care
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • emergency physician
  • work at emergency department more than 1 year.
  • 50 or more experience of endotracheal intubation

排除标准

  • having backache or wrist pain

结局指标

主要结局

intubation time

时间窗: 1 Day

1st intubation attempt, an expected average time is 1 min.

次要结局

  • success rate for intubation(1 Day)

研究者

发起方
Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Choi Hyun Young

emergency medicine fellowship

Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验