Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of the Bifrontal Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) and the Standard Bitemporal ECT in the Treatment of Patients With Schizophrenia
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 入组人数
- 100
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale
研究概览
简要总结
Electroconvulsive therapy has been used in clinical practice since 1938, a number of randomized trials found significant differences favoring ECT in response rates between individuals with depression receiving real and sham ECT. Results of early studies performed on patients with schizophrenia weren't so clear, only few of these trials found appreciable differences between real and sham ECT in clinical outcome. The recent, more reliable studies have found that ECT is efficacious on different symptoms which might be present in the course of schizophrenia, for example, psychotic and affective ones, as well as suicidality. The serious complications of electroconvulsive therapy are rare, however, more frequent side effects may include cognitive impairment and postictal delirium. Thus, the researchers try to develop new, more effective and less harmful procedures of ECT, like bifrontal electrodes. The available studies revealed that bifrontal ECT has equal efficacy to bitemporal ECT with less cognitive impairment, but the literature examining this placement is limited to major depressive disorder and the results are inconsistent. In the worldwide literature there is lack of studies regarding the use of bifrontal ECT among patients with schizophrenia. It is interesting how bifrontal ECT would affect axial symptoms of schizophrenia, since the electrodes in this procedure are placed over the brain areas responsible for negative symptoms. This randomized, double blind study is going to assess whether the bifrontal ECT is more effective in the treatment of positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia, has less harmful impact on the cognitive functions and decrease the frequency and severity of postictal delirium comparing to the bitemporal ECT. Moreover, as the first worldwide will assess the brain dopaminergic activity with the use of PET in the patients with schizophrenia after ECT and the impact of the ECT on the concentration of such neurotrophins as brain-derived neurotrophic factor-BDNF, neuron specific enolase-NSE and protein S100B.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 64 Years(Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •The patients who met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-DSM-V criteria for schizophrenia (apart from residual type)
- •The patients qualified for ECT according the standard protocol
- •Antipsychotic treatment with dibenzepins according to the following scheme: the dose of clozapine not higher than 450mg, the dose of olanzapine not higher than 20mg and the dose of quetiapine not higher than 600mg per day
- •If needed concomitant treatment allowed with hydroxyzine (max. 100mg per day) and lorazepam (max. 4mg per day)
- •Anaesthesia conducted with the use of suxamethonium chloride, propofol and atropine
排除标准
- •The lack of patient's consent
- •Mental retardation confirmed with the psychological and psychiatric examination (IQ<70; fulfilled DSM-V criteria for mental retardation)
- •Dementia diagnosed on the basis of DSM-V criteria
- •Substance abuse during the year prior study enrolment or substance addiction
- •The presence of symptoms which met DSM-V criteria for affective episode (an episode of mania, hypomania or depression)
- •The ECT conducted during 6 months prior the study enrolment
- •The history of previous ineffective ECT
- •The need for antipsychotic treatment other than derivatives of dibenzothiazepines or in doses higher than 450mg of clozapine, 20mg of olanzapine and 600mg of quetiapine per day
- •The women in the generative period who do not use effective contraception (sexual abstinence, contraceptives, intrauterine device, mechanical contraceptive devices)
- •The need for use of other than suxamethonium chloride, propofol and atropine anaesthetics and concomitant medications
结局指标
主要结局
Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale
时间窗: up to 5 weeks
Assessment conducted on baseline, after 6th, 12th and the last ECT.
Clinical Global Impression
时间窗: up to 5 weeks
Assessment conducted on baseline, after 6th, 12th and the last ECT.
Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale
时间窗: up to 5 weeks
Assessment conducted after the each ECT course.
Confusion Assessment Method
时间窗: up to 5 weeks
Assessment conducted after the each ECT course.
Verbal Memory Test
时间窗: up to 5 weeks
Assessment conducted on baseline, after the 6th ECT and one week after the last ECT (24 hours after each ECT course).
Visual Memory Test
时间窗: up to 5 weeks
Assessment conducted on baseline, after the 6th ECT and one week after the last ECT (24 hours after each ECT course).
Finger Tapping Test
时间窗: up to 5 weeks
Assessment conducted on baseline, after the 6th ECT and one week after the last ECT (24 hours after each ECT course)
Symbol Digit Coding Test
时间窗: up to 5 weeks
Assessment conducted on baseline, after the 6th ECT and one week after the last ECT (24 hours after each ECT course)
Stroop Test
时间窗: up to 5 weeks
Assessment conducted on baseline, after the 6th ECT and one week after the last ECT (24 hours after each ECT course)
Shifting Attention Test
时间窗: up to 5 weeks
Assessment conducted on baseline, after the 6th ECT and one week after the last ECT (24 hours after each ECT course)
Continuous Performance Test
时间窗: up to 5 weeks
Assessment conducted on baseline, after the 6th ECT and one week after the last ECT (24 hours after each ECT course).
次要结局
- Positron Emission Tomography to assess the impact of ECT on the dopaminergic system activity(up to 5 weeks)
- The concentration of brain-derived neurotrophic factor.(up to 5 weeks)
- The concentration of neuron specific enolase.(up to 5 weeks)
- The concentration of protein S100B(up to 5 weeks)
研究者
Jakub Kazmierski
PhD
Medical University of Lodz
