Optimization of the Self-exclusion Procedure
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 进行中（未招募）
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 2,554
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- change in total net loss over the last 4 weeks, between the last 4 weeks prior to self-exclusion T0, and the last 4 weeks at 12 months T2
研究概览
简要总结
It has been shown that self-excluded gamblers are very heavy gamblers, and that it is not possible to distinguish between those who report self-exclusion for addictive reasons and those who self-exclude for commercial reasons, which strongly suggests that all self-excluded people are "self-diagnosed" problem gamblers. Several studies converge in recognizing self-excluded people as problem gamblers who have lost control of their gambling and are seeking to protect themselves by taking action, self-exclusion, to change their behaviour and protect themselves.
Several reviews of the literature on interventions for problem gamblers have recently identified self-exclusion as an intervention for problem gamblers.
However, the effectiveness of the current self-exclusion system appears to be limited, particularly for short self-exclusions and for heavier gamblers.
Considering that self-exclusion is an intervention for and by people who have developed a gambling disorder, it currently consists exclusively of a behavioural intervention, in the sense that it prevents the behaviour. It would then be possible to optimize this intervention by enriching it with other components that have been shown to be effective with problem gamblers or in other addictions: a brief intervention including a motivational, cognitive approach, personalized normative feedback, referral to online help services (cresus and gambling infoservice), and repeated contact to suggest an extension of the self-exclusion period without having to return to the gambling environment. We hypothesize improved efficacy as measured by reduced gambling for longer after an initial optimized self-exclusion compared to self-exclusion with the standard procedure. Days will be randomized according to an a priori randomization list, not players.
详细描述
Main Objective:
The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the effect of the optimized self-exclusion procedure, compared to the existing procedure, on the intensity of gambling.
- Primary endpoint The primary endpoint is the change in total net loss over the last 4 weeks, between the last 4 weeks prior to self-exclusion T0, and the last 4 weeks at 12 months T2.
2.2 Secondary objectives The secondary objectives of the study are to assess early effect at 6 months and maintenance of effect at 18 months.
- Secondary endpoints:
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Prevention
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •18 years of age or older
- •Must be self-exclude for the first time
- •Must be Online sports betting player
- •Must be self-exclusion of 3 months or less (minimum 3 days)
排除标准
- •Player who has objected to the use of his collected data.
研究组 & 干预措施
optimized self-exclusion procedure A
optimized self-exclusion procedure including content optimization with brief intervention, normative feedback, motivational approach, a personal story of a peer who had a positive experience using the tool, re-contact before the end of the self-exclusion period to propose an extension of the period outside the gambling plateform
干预措施: self exclusion procedure (Other)
standard self-exclusion B
standard self-exclusion with a single neutral notification email
干预措施: self exclusion procedure (Other)
结局指标
主要结局
change in total net loss over the last 4 weeks, between the last 4 weeks prior to self-exclusion T0, and the last 4 weeks at 12 months T2
时间窗: between the last 4 weeks before self-exclusion T0, and the last 4 weeks at 12 months T2
次要结局
未报告次要终点