跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06375967
NCT06375967暂停不适用

Multicenter Study of EUS-guided Gallbladder Drainage vs Choledochoduodenostomy as First Line in Malignant Distal Obstruction in Palliative Patients (CARPEGIEM Trial): an Open-label, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge20 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 128 人开始时间: 2024年10月18日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
暂停
发起方
入组人数
128
试验地点
20
主要终点
RELATED ADVERSE EVENTS

研究概览

简要总结

The aim of the study is to evaluate technical, clinical and safety outcomes of lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) with a coaxial double-pigtail plastic stent (DPS) in EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomies vs cholcystogastrostomy for the management of malignant biliary obstruction in palliative patients.

详细描述

Ecoendoscopy-guided choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS) with a biliary lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) has been widely accepted as a second line treatment in cases of ERCP failure in malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO). Recent studies (DRAMBO and ELEMENT trial) compared EUS-CDS vs ERCP as a first line treatment in MDBO in palliative patients, showing similar clinical and techinal success and adverse events rate between both techniques, demonstrating that both procedures could be options for primary biliary drainage in unresectable MDBO.

Furthermore a recent clinical trial (BAMPI trial) has proven that the addition of a coaxial double pigtail (DPS) offers benefits in terms of safey and clinical success.

In the last years there has been an increasing interest for the EUS-guided gallblader drainage (EUS-GBD) in unresectable MDBO as an alternative for EUS-CDS, and recent studies and reviews have been reported with acceptable techinal and clinical success, but no clinical trial has been performed up to date.

Our hypothesis is that EUS-GBD may offer benefits in terms of safety over EUS-CDS, maintaining similar clinical and techinal success rates.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 100 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Malignant distal biliary obstruction diagnosed in patient considered PALIATIVE with biliary drainage indication.
  • Consensual malignancy by a bilio-pancreatic multidisciplinar committe (histological confirmation is not mandatory)
  • Patient capable of understanding and/or singning the informed consent.
  • Patient who understands the type of study and will comply with all follow-up tests throughout its duration

排除标准

  • Pregnancy or lactation.
  • Severe coagulation disorder: INR > 1.5 non correctable with plasma administration and/or platelet count < 50.000/mm
  • Previous cholecistectomy or gallblader perforation.
  • Tumoral obstruction of cystic duct.
  • Multiple liver metastases affecting more than 30% of the liver parenchyma
  • Distal malignant biliary strictures in patients considered resectable or borderline.
  • Benign or uncertain etiology of biliary strictures or strictures located proximally or in close proximity to the hilum.
  • Patients with prior biliary stents or other biliary drainages (e.g., PTCD).
  • Altered intestinal anatomy due to prior surgery that prevents or hinders papillary access ______________ (e.g., gastric bypass, Billroth II, duodenal switch, Roux-en-Y).
  • Gastric outlet obstruction.
  • Situations that do not allow for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (e.g., esophageal stricture).
  • Patients with functional diversity, who lack the capacity to understand the nature and potential consequences of the study, except when a legal representative is available.
  • Patients incapable of maintaining follow-up appointments (lack of adherence).
  • Lack of informed consent.

研究组 & 干预措施

EUS-GBD with LAMS-Pigtail

Experimental

Biliary drainage using EUS-guided Cholecystostomy with lumen apposing metal stent

Echoendoscopy-guided Cholecystostomy (EUS-GBD) with deployment of a lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) and axis-orienting double-pigtail plastic stent throug LAMS.

EUS-GBD technique: Diagnostic EUS. Classic or free-hand with preloaded guidewire cholecystostomy with LAMS. Pneumatic dilation whithin LAMS is allowed. 'push' technique'. Deployment of a pigtail coaxial to LAMS.

干预措施: Endoscopic biliary drainage (Procedure)

EUS-GBD with LAMS-Pigtail

Experimental

Biliary drainage using EUS-guided Cholecystostomy with lumen apposing metal stent

Echoendoscopy-guided Cholecystostomy (EUS-GBD) with deployment of a lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) and axis-orienting double-pigtail plastic stent throug LAMS.

EUS-GBD technique: Diagnostic EUS. Classic or free-hand with preloaded guidewire cholecystostomy with LAMS. Pneumatic dilation whithin LAMS is allowed. 'push' technique'. Deployment of a pigtail coaxial to LAMS.

干预措施: Lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) and double-pigtail plastic stent (DPPS) (Device)

EUS-CDS with LAMS-Pigtail

Active Comparator

Echoendoscopy-guided Choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS) with deployment of a lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) and axis-orienting double-pigtail plastic stent throug LAMS.

EUS-CDS technique: Diagnostic EUS. Classic or free-hand with preloaded guidewire choledochoduodenostomy with LAMS. Pneumatic dilation whithin LAMS is allowed. In case of bile duct < 15mm is mandatory the 'push' technique. Deployment of a pigtail coaxial to LAMS.

干预措施: Endoscopic biliary drainage (Procedure)

EUS-CDS with LAMS-Pigtail

Active Comparator

Echoendoscopy-guided Choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS) with deployment of a lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) and axis-orienting double-pigtail plastic stent throug LAMS.

EUS-CDS technique: Diagnostic EUS. Classic or free-hand with preloaded guidewire choledochoduodenostomy with LAMS. Pneumatic dilation whithin LAMS is allowed. In case of bile duct < 15mm is mandatory the 'push' technique. Deployment of a pigtail coaxial to LAMS.

干预措施: Lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) and double-pigtail plastic stent (DPPS) (Device)

结局指标

主要结局

RELATED ADVERSE EVENTS

时间窗: 12 months

Safety will be measured by careful and comparative evaluation of adverse effects in both groups.

Patients with Recurrent biliary obstruction

时间窗: 12 months

Recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) has been defined as a composite endpoint of either occlusion or migration.

次要结局

  • BILIARY REINTERVENTIONS (BRI)(12 months)
  • HOSPITAL STAY(12 months)
  • MORTALITY(12 months)
  • CLINICAL SUCCESS(2 weeks)
  • COST ANALYSIS(12 months)
  • TECHNICAL SUCCESS(24 hours)

研究者

发起方
Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Joan B Gornals

PhD and Head of Interventional Endoscopy Unit

Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge

研究点 (20)

Loading locations...

相似试验