跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05037916
NCT05037916已完成不适用

Comparison of Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging and Laser Doppler Imaging in Burn Patients

Maasstad Hospital1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 50 人开始时间: 2019年4月15日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
50
试验地点
1
主要终点
primary outcome

研究概览

简要总结

Timely and accurate estimation of the surface area and depth of a burn injury is essential for determining an appropriate treatment modality. Inappropriate or inadequate treatment may result in complications and increased societal costs. Burn depth is determined by subjective assessing the characteristics of burn injury. Some objective methods are available (e.g., biopsy and histology, thermography and laser doppler imaging), but these are cumbersome. In assessing burn wounds, laser Doppler imaging (LDI) which has a good correlation with histology, is currently the most widely used and validated noninvasive measurement tool. In addition, it is the only technique that has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. However, the use of LDI is accompanied by some disadvantages. The current commercial available LDI device is rather costly, cumbersome and has a poor spatial resolution. Another laser-based technique, laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI), works with a similar principle and might become an alternative for LDI. LSCI has some advantages over LDI such as higher spatial resolution, much easier to position, no valuable time wasted on setting up the instrument, easy to take several images of burns that have a large surface area and/or much curvature, faster measurements, fraction of the time needed for getting a high-quality measurement, able to follow changes in the perfusion in real time. In contrast to the LDI, the LSCI has not been validated in terms of a diagnostic tool for stratifying the severity of a burn (based on LDI color coding). Consequently, we will compare the LSCI with LDI to improve burn care by providing cheaper, faster and higher resolution imaging technique.

详细描述

After receiving adequate information and when informed consent is signed, patients are included. All patients receive usual care. Within 2-5 days post burn the LSCI and LDI are performed. Ideally, LDI is performed after 2 days, scanning up to 5 days is permitted when patients present later post burn or due to logistic reasons. The wounds are scanned by a trained research physician or nurse, during regular wound care.

8.4 Population base: Measurements of microcirculation with laser-based technique will be initiated upon the ethical consent is approved. Fifty burn patients will be included in the study. All patients will be asked for the existence of any comorbid disease. Once the patient meets the inclusion criteria, he will be eligible for the study.

LSCI and LDI devices will alternately be used to record blood flux. Burn wound including the healthy area 5 cm wider than the borders will be scanned by LDI and LSCI. After completing the data collection, all images will be compared to test the linearity between arbitrary units of LDI and LSCI. Based on the measured blood flux, a color image will be created, based on a color map created in a study on volunteers. Blood flux is calculated by the dedicated software.

Names of the patients will be coded with numbers. Only the main investigator will be aware of who corresponds to which number. Results of Perimed (LSCI) and Moore Devices (LDI) will be analyzed with the software PIMsoft 1.5 (Perimed AB, Järfälla, Sweden), MoorLDI2-BI Burn's Software Version 4.0, respectively. Two investigators will perform the analysis. If one investigator will make the analysis, the other will check the results, as well. Stored data will be extracted and stored coded in the castor study management system en electronic data capture system.

Assessment of microcirculation with the Perimed LSCI Pericam PSI System (Perimed AB, Järfälla, Sweden) Laser Speckle Contrast Imager is used to measure skin perfusion. The system uses a divergent laser beam with a wavelength of 785 nm. Perfusion images are acquired by averaging data from 21 images taken in rapid succession (acquisition time 1 seconds), over 1-minute intervals. A flexible working distance from 10 to 40 cm allows measurement areas up to 24 x 24 cm. Tissue blood perfusion is visualized in real time with a resolution of up to 100 µm/pixel. The system is calibrated according to the manufacturer recommendations. Perfusion images will be further analyzed by calculating mean perfusion levels in regions of interest using PIMsoft 1.5 (Perimed AB, Järfälla, Sweden).

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Case Only
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
16 Years 至 —(Child, Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • ≥ 16 years old
  • Acute burn wounds admitted in the Burn Centre of the Maasstad hospital
  • Assessment burn wounds with laser Doppler imager

排除标准

  • Unconscious patients

结局指标

主要结局

primary outcome

时间窗: 10 minutes

o To validate the LSCI device (Perimed AB, Järfälla, Sweden) in burn patients.

次要结局

  • secondary outcome(10 minutes)

研究者

发起方
Maasstad Hospital
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验