跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02505620
NCT02505620已完成不适用

Neurocognitive Function After Surgical and Conservative Therapy in OSAS Patients: a Randomized Control Trial

University of Erlangen-Nürnberg Medical School1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 80 人开始时间: 2014年9月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
80
试验地点
1
主要终点
Neurocognitive function

研究概览

简要总结

Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome (OSAS) is characterized by repeated episodes of airway obstruction while sleeping. Upper airway obstruction while sleeping leads to a dramatic decrease in oxygen saturation and to hypoxemia finally, in which consequence the patient rapidly awake. Clinical signs are sleepiness and functional cognitive deficits. The Gold standard therapy is "continuous positive airway pressure" ventilation during sleep. However, the success depends strongly to the patient´s compliance. Surgical treatment is an alternative option, which could be considered if clinical success failed. A comparison of the cognitive function of both therapies is not yet analyzed. The study addresses the question which of this treatment options is favorable regarding cognitive function and outcome.

详细描述

Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome (OSAS) is characterized by repeated episodes of airway obstruction while sleeping. The "Apnea-hypopnea index" (AHI) defined as events per hour, gives information about the severity of the disease. The American Academy of Sleep Medicine Task Force" defined that more than 5 episodes per hour is strongly suspect for an OSAS disease. Upper airway obstruction while sleeping leads to a dramatic decrease in oxygen saturation and to hypoxemia finally, in which consequence the patient rapidly awake. The prevalence rise with age and about 20% of the population is suspect to a sleep disorder. However about 1-5% of male and about 0,5-2% of female aged adults are affected. Main reason is obesity. Clinical signs are sleepiness and functional cognitive deficits. The Gold standard therapy is "continuous positive airway pressure" ventilation during sleep. However, the success depends strongly to the patient´s compliance. Surgical treatment is an alternative option, which could be considered if clinical success failed. It is notable that the long-term mortality is comparable in both medical treatment options. However, a comparison of the cognitive function of both therapies is not yet analyzed. The study addresses the question which of this treatment options is favorable regarding cognitive function and outcome.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
30 Years 至 70 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • * Patients within 30 to 70 years of age both gender.

排除标准

  • Patients under 30 years of age or older than 70 years of age.
  • Preexisting neurological, neuropsychological deficits or diseases, e.g. cerebral insult or epilepsy.
  • Preexisting neurological, neuropsychological medication.
  • Preexisting neuromuscular diseases.
  • Alcohol - and drug abuse.
  • Postoperative complications, pain and time shifts within the test protocol.

结局指标

主要结局

Neurocognitive function

时间窗: 4 months

Using different tests addressing a various quality of neurocognitive function (attention, memory, perceptual and processing speed, alertness and executive function) participants score test appropriate values. Comparing test values separately allows to distinguish between prior - and post - operative and prior and post - interventional status. Moreover it allows to discriminate achieved test results between both groups and calculate statistical differences. Favorable test results lead to a potential better neurocognitive function outcome and enable to assess neurocognitive function in the light of operation or interventional consequence.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
University of Erlangen-Nürnberg Medical School
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验