跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04230850
NCT04230850已完成不适用

The Effects of Stretching Versus Static and Dynamic Cupping on Lumbar Range of Motion

University of South Carolina2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 45 人开始时间: 2020年1月20日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
45
试验地点
2
主要终点
Back Range of Motion

研究概览

简要总结

The objective of this study is to fill gaps in the literature regarding the effectiveness of cupping therapy on lumbar stiffness. Participants will be recruited from the University of South Carolina and from local clinics in Columbia, South Carolina. Individuals will be classified based on lumbar range of motion limitations, and then they will be equally dispersed into three treatment groups via stratified randomization. These groups include dynamic cupping, static cupping, or stretching. All participants will be assessed prior to selected treatment to obtain baseline values for four measures: back range of motion (BROM), pain pressure threshold (PPT), active straight leg raise (ASLR), and numeric pain rating scale (NPRS). Participants will be given each measure directly after treatment, followed by a follow-up measurement 24 hours after treatment.

详细描述

Cupping therapy has become recently popular in Western culture due to affordability, lack of invasiveness, and low risk of adverse effects. However, there is insufficient evidence of the effectiveness on this treatment technique on decreasing pain and increasing range of motion. This project aims to help fill the gaps by using a larger sample size and clear methodology.

The aims of the study include to determine if both static and dynamic cupping therapy have a greater effect on BROM, PPT, ASLR, and NRPS as compared to stretching, and if any changes made are maintained to a different degree over a 24 hour period based on treatment. Additional aims of the study include to determine if there is a difference between type of cupping (static vs dynamic) on these four measures. By performing this study, scientific knowledge of cupping therapy will be improved and expanded, thus impacting how it is used in clinical practice.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Double (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

盲法说明

The people collecting the data will not be aware of which intervention group the subjects were allocated to.

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • 18 years or older, 50 degrees or less of lumbar flexion

排除标准

  • Cancer, organ failure, collagen disorders, deep vein thrombosis, pacemakers, bleeding disorders, recent fever

结局指标

主要结局

Back Range of Motion

时间窗: At baseline, immediately following treatment, 24-hour follow up

The BROM instrument will be used to measure lumbar range of motion in individuals with lumbar stiffness at initial baseline, the change in range of motion immediately following treatment, and any maintained change at 24 hour follow up.

次要结局

  • Pain Pressure Threshold(At baseline, immediately following treatment, 24-hour follow up)
  • Active Straight Leg Raise(At baseline, immediately following treatment, 24-hour follow up)
  • Numeric Pain Rating Scale(At baseline, immediately following treatment, 24-hour follow up)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Cathy Arnot

Clinical Associate Professor

University of South Carolina

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验