跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06705244
NCT06705244进行中(未招募)不适用

Trans-nasal Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block Versus Ultrasound-guided Bilateral Greater and Lesser Occipital Nerve Block for Management of Post-Dural Puncture Headache After Spinal Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Lower Abdominal Surgeries

Ain Shams University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 50 人开始时间: 2023年3月6日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
进行中(未招募)
入组人数
50
试验地点
1
主要终点
Patient satisfaction

研究概览

简要总结

Post-Dural Puncture Headache (PDPH) is a complication associated with spinal anesthesia. While conventional treatments are available, the Epidural Blood Patch (EBP) is considered the gold standard. Other less invasive interventions, such as Sphenopalatine Ganglion (SPG) block and Greater Occipital Nerve (GON) block, have also been used to treat PDPH. The trans-nasal approach is a non-invasive, low-risk technique that can be performed at the bedside without imaging tools.

The Lesser Occipital Nerve Block (LONB) is often used in conjunction with the GONB to address headaches in the lateral occipital region.

This study aims to compare the efficacy of trans-nasal sphenopalatine ganglion block (TNSGB) versus Greater and Lesser Occipital Nerve Block (GALONB) guided by ultrasound in relieving PDPH and its symptoms, as well as to assess patient satisfaction with the interventions.

Conducted at Ain Shams University Hospitals with approval from the medical ethical committee, the study included 50 participants (25 per group) who were ASA class I or II candidates for spinal anesthesia undergoing elective lower abdominal surgeries. Participants were randomly assigned to two groups:

  • Group TNSGB: Received a trans-nasal sphenopalatine ganglion block using cotton-tipped applicators inserted trans-nasally until positioned in the posterior nasopharynx.
  • Group GALONB: Received a Greater and Lesser Occipital Nerve Block under ultrasound guidance to identify nerves, foramina, vascular structures, and their course.

Patient satisfaction was evaluated using a 5-point Likert scale. The analgesic efficacy of TNSGB versus GALONB was assessed using a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at 0, 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after treatment.

Adverse events, the need for rescue analgesia, and other therapeutic interventions were also recorded.

详细描述

  • Type of Study:

Exploratory single-blind randomized comparative trial. (Only the data collection personnel were blinded to the group assignment).

• Study Settings: Ain Shams University Hospitals.

  • Study Period:

6 months

  • Study Population:

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 45 Years(Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •Physical status: ASA 1 or 2 and candidates for spinal anesthesia undergoing elective lower abdominal surgeries.
  • •Age group: 18-45 years. Sex: Both sexes Body mass index of less than 35 kg/m2

排除标准

  • •Declining to give written informed consent. History of allergy to the medications used in the study. Contraindications to regional anesthesia (including coagulopathy, and local infection).
  • •Psychiatric disorder and/or Drug Addiction. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Class III and more. Moderate to severe hepatic and renal diseases. Emergency surgeries. Nasal septal deviation, Nasal deformity and/or nasal bleeding. Had received opioids less than 12 hours before study inclusion. History of migraines or persistent headaches.

研究组 & 干预措施

trans-nasal sphenopalatine ganglion block (TNSGB)

Active Comparator

干预措施: Trans-nasal sphenopalatine nerve block (Procedure)

greater and lesser occipital nerve block (GALONB)

Active Comparator

干预措施: Greater and lesser occipital nerve block (Procedure)

结局指标

主要结局

Patient satisfaction

时间窗: After 48 hours

Patients were asked to evaluate their satisfaction regarding the received intervention through 5-point Likert scale (1 = very satisfied, 2 = satisfied, 3 = neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, 4 = dissatisfied, 5= very dissatisfied).

次要结局

  • the analgesic efficacy of the TNSPGB versus GALONB for treatment of PDPH(at baseline 0, at 30 minutes, 1 hour , 2 hours, 3 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, 24hours and 48 hours after treatment.)
  • Need for rescue analgesia(after 4 hours of given intervention)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验