跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2019/09/021054
CTRI/2019/09/021054尚未招募不适用

Comparision of ease of oro-tracheal intubation using Adult Miller and Macintosh blade - A randomized crossover study.

Mahatama Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute Pondicherry1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 200 人开始时间: 2019年9月15日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
发起方
入组人数
200
试验地点
1
主要终点
Ease of intubation with respect to first attempt success rate which is defined as single passage of endotracheal tube without use of assisted manoeuvres like bougie, stylet or backward, upward, rightward pressure.

研究概览

简要总结

Airway management is the primary responsibility of the Anesthesiologists which is to secure, preserve and protect it during induction and maintainance and recovery from anaesthesia. Laryngoscopy forms an essential component of general anesthesia and endotracheal intubation. The aim of the laryngoscopy is to obtain a good view of the vocal cords and to facilitate smooth oro-tracheal intubation. Therefore to achieve smooth orotracheal intubation Anesthesiologists various techniques such as optimal head and neck position and various kinds of laryngoscopes to get an optimal view of the glottis.

Conventionally, Anaesthesiologist use Macintosh blade for adult intubation and Miller blade for pediatric population. In routine practice, Miller laryngoscope is rarely used in adult and therefore very few literature evidence comparing the straight adult Miller and curved Macintosh laryngoscope in terms of orotracheal intubation. Previous study reviews suggested that glottis view is better with the adult Miller blade while ease of orotracheal intubation had inconclusive results.

The previous studies based on randomised clinical trial were conducted on two different individuals and there is lack in literature review with respect to crossover design comparing adult Miller and Macintosh laryngoscope. Hence, we have designed a randomised crossover study to compare ease of orotracheal intubation using adult Miller and Macintosh laryngoscope, on the same individual.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Computer generated randomization
盲法
Not Applicable

入排标准

年龄范围
18.00 Year(s) 至 60.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • 60 years. ASA 1 and 2 Elective surgeries requiring General Anaesthesia with Endotracheal intubation.

排除标准

  • Anticipated difficult airway.
  • ASA 3 and
  • Emergency surgeries.

结局指标

主要结局

Ease of intubation with respect to first attempt success rate which is defined as single passage of endotracheal tube without use of assisted manoeuvres like bougie, stylet or backward, upward, rightward pressure.

时间窗: Baseline. | Induction. | Immediately after 1st laryngoscopy. | Between 1st and 2nd laryngoscopy. | Immediately after intubation. | 1st minute. | 2nd minute. | 3rd minute. | 4th minute. | 5th minute.

次要结局

  • Cormack Lehane grading.(Time taken for orotracheal intubation.)

研究者

发起方
Mahatama Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute Pondicherry
申办方类型
Private medical college

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验