跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03272386
NCT03272386已完成不适用

Verbal Instruction to Obtain Voluntary Pelvic Floor Muscle Contraction: Acceptability, Understanding and Best Instruction

Pierre and Marie Curie University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 33 人开始时间: 2017年7月31日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
33
试验地点
1
主要终点
Description of the instructions used by the professionals

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of this study is to determine the best verbal instruction to obtain a PFMC and to evaluate the understanding and acceptability of the proposed instructions.

详细描述

Pelvic floor muscles contraction (PFMC) is usually recommended for evaluation and treatment of pelvic floor disorders.

In clinical practice, many patients fail to achieve a voluntary PFMC and only about one-third of women perform an ideal PFMC after brief written or verbal instruction. When no PFMC is elicited, it might be explained by an anatomical or neurological issue but also by a lack of understanding of the instructions and / or poor knowledge of the anatomy. Pelvic floor muscles (PFM) evaluation may depends on the method used to elicit and assess the contraction including verbal instructions. There is no current gold standard methodology for quantifying PFM strength and the verbal instructions used to elicit the PFMC are rarely reported in the studies. There is few specific works about the instructions. One recent study report that the pattern of urethral movement is influenced by the instructions used to teach activation of the PFM in men. Another study showed that some specific instructions are most effective in eliciting a correct PFMC in women.

Thus, an appropriate verbal instruction in terms of understanding, social and cultural acceptability, taking into account the anatomical knowledge of the patients, would probably allow a better evaluation of the PFM and even a better efficacy of pelvic floor training.

The purpose of this study is to determine the best verbal instruction to obtain a PFMC and to evaluate the understanding and acceptability of the proposed instructions.

This is a prospective observational study lead in two phases in the Neurourology Department of a University Hospital.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Other
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •Follow in neuro-urology
  • •Lower urinary tract symptoms

排除标准

  • •Can't speak French

结局指标

主要结局

Description of the instructions used by the professionals

时间窗: 1 day during the consultation

Qualitative description of the instructions and selection of the most frequent instructions.

次要结局

  • Acceptability, understanding and selection of the best instruction by the subjects(1 day during the consultation)

研究者

发起方
Pierre and Marie Curie University
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Gérard Amarenco

Head of Neuro-Urology department, Tenon hospital

Pierre and Marie Curie University

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验