Verbal Instruction to Obtain Voluntary Pelvic Floor Muscle Contraction: Acceptability, Understanding and Best Instruction
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 33
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Description of the instructions used by the professionals
研究概览
简要总结
The purpose of this study is to determine the best verbal instruction to obtain a PFMC and to evaluate the understanding and acceptability of the proposed instructions.
详细描述
Pelvic floor muscles contraction (PFMC) is usually recommended for evaluation and treatment of pelvic floor disorders.
In clinical practice, many patients fail to achieve a voluntary PFMC and only about one-third of women perform an ideal PFMC after brief written or verbal instruction. When no PFMC is elicited, it might be explained by an anatomical or neurological issue but also by a lack of understanding of the instructions and / or poor knowledge of the anatomy. Pelvic floor muscles (PFM) evaluation may depends on the method used to elicit and assess the contraction including verbal instructions. There is no current gold standard methodology for quantifying PFM strength and the verbal instructions used to elicit the PFMC are rarely reported in the studies. There is few specific works about the instructions. One recent study report that the pattern of urethral movement is influenced by the instructions used to teach activation of the PFM in men. Another study showed that some specific instructions are most effective in eliciting a correct PFMC in women.
Thus, an appropriate verbal instruction in terms of understanding, social and cultural acceptability, taking into account the anatomical knowledge of the patients, would probably allow a better evaluation of the PFM and even a better efficacy of pelvic floor training.
The purpose of this study is to determine the best verbal instruction to obtain a PFMC and to evaluate the understanding and acceptability of the proposed instructions.
This is a prospective observational study lead in two phases in the Neurourology Department of a University Hospital.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Other
- 时间视角
- Prospective
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Follow in neuro-urology
- •Lower urinary tract symptoms
排除标准
- •Can't speak French
结局指标
主要结局
Description of the instructions used by the professionals
时间窗: 1 day during the consultation
Qualitative description of the instructions and selection of the most frequent instructions.
次要结局
- Acceptability, understanding and selection of the best instruction by the subjects(1 day during the consultation)
研究者
Gérard Amarenco
Head of Neuro-Urology department, Tenon hospital
Pierre and Marie Curie University
