跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03966989
NCT03966989撤回不适用

Improving Quality & Equity of Emergency Care Decisions (IQED): R21 Pilot Phase

University of Southern California8 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家开始时间: 2021年12月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
撤回
试验地点
8
主要终点
Efficacy of behavioral nudges to improve quality and safety in Emergency Medicine through measurement of adherence to guidelines: Antibiotic prescribing

研究概览

简要总结

Recent work in emergency medicine has shown errors were more likely to occur at the end of shifts, as pressure exists to make a number of decisions simultaneously, and after what may be an already long series of cognitive challenges. Decision fatigue may also contribute to disparities by surfacing subconscious bias. The objective of the R21 pilot phase of Improving Quality & Equity of Emergency Care Decisions (IQED) is to identify addressable gaps in quality and equity and use performance feedback as an intervention to improve performance on chest pain, CT imaging, and antibiotic prescribing. Performance feedback intervention will include feedback offline via email or text.

详细描述

The objective of the R21 pilot phase of Improving Quality & Equity of Emergency Care Decisions (IQED) is to identify addressable gaps in quality and equity and use performance feedback as an intervention to improve performance on chest pain, CT imaging, and antibiotic prescribing. Performance feedback intervention will include feedback offline via email or text.

Each clinician will be randomized at the provider or clinic level to either the intervention or control group. Once clinicians are randomized, the aforementioned intervention will be turned on for a 3-6 month time period.

For providers in the intervention group, the goal is to evaluate the effect of social norms on overuse and underuse behavior related to prescriptions or testing. Near real-time social norms will be delivered to providers which benchmark their own performance on various metrics to that of their peers. The investigators performance feedback reports for each provider randomized to receive the audit and feedback intervention will have three key characteristics: (1) each target provider will receive his or her individual performance, (2) benchmarks will prominently feature the performance of providers who would be considered credible peers of the target provider, and (3) benchmarks will reflect only performance that is desirable (e.g., showing only the performance of the best-performing credible peers).

Providers randomized to the control group will follow standard practice.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Attendings and residents that see patients in the Emergency Department.

排除标准

  • 未提供

结局指标

主要结局

Efficacy of behavioral nudges to improve quality and safety in Emergency Medicine through measurement of adherence to guidelines: Antibiotic prescribing

时间窗: 6 months

Measurement of clinician adherence to guidelines for quality measures related to antibiotic prescribing (proportion of inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions for acute respiratory infections)

Efficacy of behavioral nudges to improve quality and safety in Emergency Medicine through measurement of adherence to guidelines: CT imaging

时间窗: 6 months

Measurement of clinician adherence to guidelines for quality measures related to CT imaging (proportion of orders for unnecessary CT scans)

Efficacy of behavioral nudges to improve quality and safety in Emergency Medicine through measurement of adherence to guidelines: Chest Pain

时间窗: 6 months

Measurement of clinician adherence to guidelines for quality measures related to chest pain (proportion of cases in which HEART score algorithm was used for chest pain patients)

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Daniella Meeker

Assistant Professor

University of Southern California

研究点 (8)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Improving Quality & Equity of Emergency Care... | 临床试验