跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT07097844
NCT07097844尚未招募4 期

A Comparison of the Efficacy of Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block and Penile Block in Circumcision Surgery

Siirt Training and Research Hospital0 个研究点目标入组 62 人开始时间: 2025年8月15日最近更新:
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
4 期
状态
尚未招募
发起方
入组人数
62
主要终点
FLACC Pain Score

研究概览

简要总结

Effective perioperative analgesia is crucial for reducing hospital stay in pediatric surgical patients. Opioid-based analgesia, although effective, may lead to respiratory depression in the postoperative period. Therefore, alternative regional anesthesia techniques such as penile block and sacral ESPB are increasingly preferred.

Sacral ESPB provides both somatic and visceral analgesia by blocking the dorsal and ventral rami of the spinal nerves. It has the potential to block the pudendal nerve and achieve bilateral effect with a single midline injection. However, comparative data between sacral ESPB and penile block in circumcision surgeries is limited.

详细描述

Effective perioperative analgesia is crucial for reducing hospital stay in pediatric surgical patients. Opioid-based analgesia, although effective, may lead to respiratory depression in the postoperative period. Therefore, alternative regional anesthesia techniques such as penile block and sacral ESPB are increasingly preferred.

Sacral ESPB provides both somatic and visceral analgesia by blocking the dorsal and ventral rami of the spinal nerves. It has the potential to block the pudendal nerve and achieve bilateral effect with a single midline injection. However, comparative data between sacral ESPB and penile block in circumcision surgeries is limited.

In this prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial, 62 children aged 2 to 7 years undergoing elective circumcision at the Department of Pediatric Surgery of Diyarbakır Gazi Yaşargil Training and Research Hospital will be randomly assigned to two groups:

Group I will receive sacral ESPB using 0.8 mL/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine

Group II will receive a penile block using the same dosage and concentration.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Prevention
盲法
Single (Participant)

入排标准

年龄范围
2 Years 至 7 Years(Child)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • ASA I pediatric patients aged 2-7 years
  • Scheduled for elective circumcision
  • Informed consent obtained from parents/legal guardians

排除标准

  • ASA score other than I
  • Age <2 or >7 years
  • Known allergy to local anesthetics
  • Refusal to participate

研究组 & 干预措施

Group I - Sacral ESPB

Active Comparator

Type: Procedure

Name: Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block

Description: Ultrasound-guided sacral ESPB using 0.8 mL/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine

干预措施: 0.8 mL/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine (Drug)

Group II - Penile Block

Active Comparator

Type: Procedure

Name: Penile Block

penile block using 0.8 mL/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine

干预措施: 0.8 mL/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine (Drug)

结局指标

主要结局

FLACC Pain Score

时间窗: From arrival in the recovery room until 24 hours postoperatively

Postoperative pain will be assessed using the FLACC (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability) scale at 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 minutes, and 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, and 24 hours after surgery. A FLACC score ≥4 will be treated with rescue analgesia.

次要结局

  • Total Perioperative Opioid and Rescue Analgesic Consumption(Up to 24 hours postoperatively)

研究者

发起方
Siirt Training and Research Hospital
申办方类型
Other Gov
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

ali kendal oğuz

specialist doctor in anestesiology and reanimation

Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi Gazi Yasargil Training and Research Hospital

相似试验