跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT07209605
NCT07209605尚未招募不适用

Mini-anchor Versus Pull-out Suture for Surgical Management of Volar Plate Injuries

Sohag University0 个研究点目标入组 12 人开始时间: 2025年10月1日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
入组人数
12
主要终点
range of motion by geniometer

研究概览

简要总结

Volar plate injuries of the joint are among the most common traumatic lesions in the hand. These injuries result from hyperextension trauma, leading to volar plate avulsion, often accompanied by collateral ligament injuries or fractures of the volar plate Conventional repair techniques include pull-out . Although widely used, pull-out sutures are associated with specific complications such as skin irritation. The external suture may also interfere with early mobilization, a key factor for good postoperative outcomes (3).

Suture anchors have emerged as a modern alternative, offering internal fixation without the need for pull out sutures. Their application is believed to promote faster recovery, minimize soft tissue irritation, and early mobilization

详细描述

Volar plate injuries of the joint are among the most common traumatic lesions in the hand. These injuries result from hyperextension trauma, leading to volar plate avulsion, often accompanied by collateral ligament injuries or fractures of the volar plate Conventional repair techniques include pull-out . Although widely used, pull-out sutures are associated with specific complications such as skin irritation. The external suture may also interfere with early mobilization, a key factor for good postoperative outcomes (3).

Suture anchors have emerged as a modern alternative, offering internal fixation without the need for pull out sutures. Their application is believed to promote faster recovery, minimize soft tissue irritation, and early mobilization Aim of the Work The aim of this study is to compare the clinical and functional outcomes of mini-anchor versus pull-out suture techniques in surgical management of volar plate injuries of the PIP joint.

-Place of the study: Sohag University Hospitals after approval from the institutional ethical committee.

-Type of the study: A prospective randomized clinical trial.

  • Study period:

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 55 Years(Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients aged 18-55 years.
  • Both sexes.
  • Isolated volar plate injury.
  • Closed injuries.
  • Willingness to participate and follow rehabilitation protocol.

排除标准

  • Osteoprotic patients
  • Associated neurovascular or tendon injuries.
  • Open fractures or infections.
  • Previous surgeries on the same finger.
  • Inability to follow up.

结局指标

主要结局

range of motion by geniometer

时间窗: 6weeks

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Ali Mohammed Ali Hammam

Orthopedics resident. Sohag University hospital

Sohag University

相似试验

Mini-anchor Versus Pull-out Suture for Surgical... | 临床试验