跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT07625852
NCT07625852尚未招募不适用

Impact of Vertical vs. Transverse Closure on Outcomes of Laparoscopic Correction of Isthmocele

Minia University0 个研究点目标入组 72 人开始时间: 2026年6月1日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
发起方
入组人数
72

研究概览

简要总结

Laparoscopic repair of Isthmocele aims to restore the anatomical integrity and physiological function of the lower uterine segment.

  • Vertical Closure: This technique involves closing the defect along the longitudinal axis of the uterus. Proponents suggest it may be more anatomically aligned with the muscle fibers of the lower uterine segment, potentially leading to stronger scar formation and reduced tension.
  • Transverse Closure: This technique involves closing the defect perpendicular to the long axis of the uterus. This approach is more commonly used during primary cesarean sections.

Arguments for transverse closure in isthmocele repair include familiarity for surgeons and potentially less shortening of the lower uterine segment.

However, the actual impact of these different closure methods on long-term outcomes such as defect recurrence, scar integrity, and fertility, remains largely unexplored in a randomized controlled trial setting.

详细描述

Isthmocele, also known as a cesarean scar defect (CSD), is a common complication following cesarean section, characterized by a myometrial defect at the site of the hysterotomy scar. It can lead to various symptoms including abnormal uterine bleeding, dysmenorrhea, pelvic pain, and infertility.

Laparoscopic repair aims to restore the anatomical integrity and physiological function of the lower uterine segment.

  • Vertical Closure: This technique involves closing the defect along the longitudinal axis of the uterus. Proponents suggest it may be more anatomically aligned with the muscle fibers of the lower uterine segment, potentially leading to stronger scar formation and reduced tension.
  • Transverse Closure: This technique involves closing the defect perpendicular to the long axis of the uterus. This approach is more commonly used during primary cesarean sections.

Arguments for transverse closure in isthmocele repair include familiarity for surgeons and potentially less shortening of the lower uterine segment.

However, the actual impact of these different closure methods on long-term outcomes such as defect recurrence, scar integrity, and fertility, remains largely unexplored in a randomized controlled trial setting.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single (Participant)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 45 Years(Adult)
性别
Female
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Women aged 18-45 years.
  • Diagnosis of symptomatic isthmocele confirmed by transvaginal ultrasound (myometrial thickness at the defect < 2.5 mm).
  • History of at least one prior cesarean section.
  • Symptoms attributable to isthmocele (e.g., abnormal uterine bleeding, pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, secondary infertility).
  • Desire for surgical correction of isthmocele.
  • Ability to understand and provide informed consent

排除标准

  • Asymptomatic isthmocele.
  • Active pelvic infection or malignancy.
  • Significant medical comorbidities contraindicating laparoscopic surgery.
  • Coagulopathy.
  • Known uterine anomalies (e.g., bicornuate uterus).
  • Pregnancy at the time of recruitment.
  • Inability to comply with follow-up protocol.

研究者

发起方
Minia University
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Mohamed Hassan Mohamed Abdel Ghfar

Lecturer of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Minia University

相似试验