跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT00785447
NCT00785447已完成不适用

Comparison of the Efficiency of Mouth-to-nose Breathing With Mouth-to-mouth Breathing in Non-paralyzed Adult Patients Under General Anesthesia

Massachusetts General Hospital2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 20 人开始时间: 2008年3月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
20
试验地点
2
主要终点
Comparing CO2 elimination with mouth-to-nose versus mouth-to-mouth breathing in non-paralyzed adult patients under general anesthesia.

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of this study is to find out the best way of providing artificial breathing during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Current standard CPR involves giving mouth-to-mouth breathing to people requiring CPR. The rescuer pinches the person's nostrils closed and breathes into the mouth of the unconscious person with his or her own mouth.

Some CPR studies have shown that it might be easier and more effective to breathe air into a person's nose instead of the mouth. People receiving CPR often have blocked airways, so breathing into the mouth does not always work.

We think mouth-to-nose breathing may be more efficient and easier to do. In this case, the rescuer closes the person's mouth by pushing the jaw up and holding it still. Then the rescuer breathes into the unconscious person's nose by covering the nose entirely with his or her mouth. We are doing this study to try to find out which way works better.

We will perform both ways of breathing on people who are unconscious (asleep) before planned (non-emergency) surgery and compare their effectiveness.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Na
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 59 Years(Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Healthy subjects between 18 to 59 years of age
  • meeting ASA I-II criteria
  • Undergoing elective surgery and requiring general anesthesia
  • Being able to breathe through both the nose and the mouth while awake

排除标准

  • Patients with known infectious diseases, bacteria infections such as Neisseria meningitidis, upper respiratory tract infection (URI), bacterial pneumonia, etc. and patients with known HIV, HBV, HCV, or TB infection. Patients with broken oral mucosa or obvious sores.
  • Patients with immunosuppression from radiotherapy, chemotherapy, etc.
  • Patients with cardiovascular disease, respiratory disease, cerebral vascular disease and ASA class III or greater risk for anesthesia as defined by the American Society of Anesthesiologists.
  • Abnormal vital signs on the day of admission for surgery (HR, BP, room air oxygen saturation, EKG) that are not correctable with his or her routine medication or commonly used pre-operative medication.
  • Ischemic heart disease with chest pain or arrhythmias, patients with a pacemaker or AICD device and patients with heart failure.
  • Respiratory diseases, including subjects with COPD, asthma, pulmonary hypertension, restrictive lung disease, pleural effusion, tracheal stenosis and tracheal malacia, respiratory tract infection within the preceding week and those with previous pneumonectomy, lobectomy, tracheostomy, laryngectomy, tongue resection, and pharyngeal laryngeal plasity.
  • Unable to open mouth (<2.5 cm) or unable to breathe through mouth or nose.
  • Anticipated difficult airway: Mallampati score of III or greater, decreased neck movement, decreased mandibular movement, history of therapeutic radiation to the larynx or neck, prominent incisors. Subjects require or may require fiberoptic intubation
  • Important nasal septum deviation or other conditions impairing nasal breathing. The patient's nasal patency will be confirmed by inspiring with the mouth shut and open.
  • Gastric-esophageal reflex or a full stomach.
  • Obese with BMI greater than
  • Neurological symptoms associated with neck extension, neurological deficit from previous stroke or spinal cord injury, recent stroke or TIA within 2 weeks.
  • Pregnant women and women less than one month post-partum. Ruling out pregnancy will be conducted by careful history and physical examination as done routinely prior to a surgery. If the history is believed to be unreliable, the patient will be excluded unless a pregnancy test is performed and the result of the test is negative.
  • Emergency cases, and subjects who have not adhered to the ASA NPO guidelines.

结局指标

主要结局

Comparing CO2 elimination with mouth-to-nose versus mouth-to-mouth breathing in non-paralyzed adult patients under general anesthesia.

时间窗: 1.5 years

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Robert M. Kacmarek

Professor of Anesthesia, Director of Respiratory Care Services

Massachusetts General Hospital

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验