NCT07102485尚未招募不适用
A Comparison of Labels "Natural Immunity" and "Disease-induced" Immunity
适应症
干预措施
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 入组人数
- 350
- 主要终点
- Opinion about forms of immunity
研究概览
简要总结
A comparison of how people respond to the terms "natural immunity" versus "disease-induced immunity".
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Health Services Research
- 盲法
- Single (Participant)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •Able to use a computer
- •Able to use the internet
- •Able to read and respond to questions in English or French
- •18+ years old and living in Canada
排除标准
- •not meeting inclusion criteria
研究组 & 干预措施
natural immunity
Placebo Comparator
Label used is standard term "natural immunity"
干预措施: natural immunity (Other)
disease-induced immunity
Experimental
Label used is "disease-induced immunity"
干预措施: disease-induced immunity (Other)
结局指标
主要结局
Opinion about forms of immunity
时间窗: Immediately after intervention
Participants indicate their opinion in response to question, "In your opinion, which is better: vaccine-induced immunity or natural/disease-induced immunity?" on a visual analog scale (slider) from 0-100, with 0 = "vaccine-induced immunity is much better," 50 = "both forms of immunity are equally good," 100 = "natural/disease-induced immunity is much better."
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
相似试验
已完成
4 期
The study to compare the immune response between intradermal and intramuscular injection of botulinum toxin AHealthy human volunteersEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Botulinum Toxins, Immunoglobulins, AntibodiesTCTR20211204002Dermatologic Surgery, Dermatology department, Siriraj hospital, Thailand100
已完成
不适用
Effectiveness of Homoeopathic Medicines Azadirachta indica-Q and Echinacea angustifolia-Q in AllergyCTRI/2019/09/021405Central Council for Research in Homoeopathy20
已完成
4 期
Comparition of immunity and reaction of bOPV vaccine and tOPV vaccine in routine immunization schedule, with or without IPV vaccine administration at DTP3 vaccine contact: A controlled trialCTRI/2013/06/003722World health Organization900
已完成
不适用
Comparative evaluation of immunogenicity and reactogenicity of monovalent type 2 and 3 oral poliovirus vaccines (mOPV 2 and mOPV3) versus trivalent oral poliovirus vaccine (tOPV), and bivalent oral poliovirus vaccine (bOPV) versus monovalent types 1 and 3 oral poliovirus vaccines, respectively: a randomised double-blind trialPoliomyelitisInfections and InfestationsOther viral encephalitis, not elsewhere classifiedISRCTN64725429Panacea Biotec Limited (India)900
已完成
3 期
Evaluation of Insulin Glulisine (GP40321) Compared to Insulin Glulisine (Apidra® SoloStar®) in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus PatientsType 1 Diabetes MellitisNCT07070752Geropharm224