跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04869878
NCT04869878已完成不适用

Inter-rater Reliability of the Clinical Frailty Scale in a Swedish Emergency Department Setting

University Hospital, Linkoeping1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 100 人开始时间: 2021年5月3日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
100
试验地点
1
主要终点
Level of inter-rater reliability regarding frailty as assessed by CFS

研究概览

简要总结

Frailty is a common clinical syndrome in older adults, which may be assessed through various assessment tools. One frequently used tool is the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) which potentially can be adopted for daily use in the Emergency Department and has been appraised for reliability to some extent, but have so far not been evaluated in the Swedish emergency care context.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the inter-rater reliability of the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) in a clinical Swedish Emergency Department (ED) setting. Members of multidisciplinary emergency care teams will conduct the assessments individually.

详细描述

The CFS is introduced and tested as part of a quality-improvement process regarding elderly people within the Emergency departments (EDs) of Region Östergötland (Östergötland County) in Sweden.

CFS is a 9-point scale developed within the Canadian Study of Health and Aging. It comprises of a pictograms and a clinical description to help assign scores ranging from very fit to terminally ill. CFS enables clinicians to rapidly stratify the degree of frailty in the elderly with the help of questions and clinical assessment. However, since the assessment is judgement based, it is important that the inter-rater reliability is satisfactory.

This study is part of a larger project where all eligible patients who visit the ED (24/7) for a period of four weeks will be enrolled and then subsequently assessed with CFS by one of their responsible health-care professionals (i.e. physician, registered nurse or nurse assistant). For this study, each professional on the team will individually assess each patient. First, a clinical judgement is performed (frail/not frail) without any instrument, and then the patient is assessed by using the CFS. This will take place during work shifts when someone from the research team is present and can arrange the assessments, as well as ensure that they are conducted independently. These work shifts will be selected using the online application Research Randomizer, to randomly include all hours of the day as well as eligible health-care professionals.

The research-team member will collect the assigned CFS-scores and information on the age, gender, profession, position (emergency physician or intern/resident from other specialities) and the number of years in the profession of each assessor. Informed consent will be obtained from all health-care professionals who participate. No data that can identify any patient will be collected.

Sample size is determined to be 100 patients, which would be more than sufficient with a power of 90% and α 0,05.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Other
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
65 Years 至 —(Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Health-care professionals:
  • Working in the ED, as part of the emergency-care team that are responsible for a patient ≥65 years
  • ≥65 years

排除标准

  • Health care professionals:
  • Unwilling to provide informed consent
  • ≤65 years

结局指标

主要结局

Level of inter-rater reliability regarding frailty as assessed by CFS

时间窗: The assessment will be made in connection with the patient´s first meeting with the care team, i.e. within 1 hour from the patient´s arrival to the ED

Inter-rater reliability of the CFS, expressed as Intraclass Correlation Coefficient

次要结局

  • Agreement between CFS and clinical judgement (frail/not frail)(The clinical judgement is made just before the assessment with CFS)
  • Level of correlation between degree of frailty (CFS 1-9) and degree of inter-rater reliability(The assessment will be made in connection with the patient´s first meeting with the care team, i.e. within 1 hour from the patient´s arrival to the ED)

研究者

发起方
University Hospital, Linkoeping
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Daniel Wilhelms

Principal Investigator

University Hospital, Linkoeping

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验