Food for Thought: A Randomized Trial of Food Insecurity Screening in the Emergency Department
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 1,818
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Presence of Food Insecurity
研究概览
简要总结
This study compares food insecurity disclosure rates in face-to-face interviews versus electronic formats, and explores caregiver preferences regarding screening modality and location, in a large, urban pediatric emergency department. Half of the participants were screened for food insecurity verbally, face-to-face by a research assistant, and half of the participants were screened electronically by a tablet.
详细描述
Children are disproportionately affected by the rise in poverty rates in the United States, and economic hardships can compromise their development, negatively affect their overall health, and adversely affect their abilities to succeed in school and in life. Food insecurity (FI)-the limited or uncertain availability of nutritionally adequate or safe foods- while strongly associated with poverty, is an independent predictor of poor health outcomes for children.
The Emergency Department (ED) of academic medical centers often serves as a point of care entry for impoverished and high-risk families. Although there is a growing interest in the healthcare system's ability to address Social Determinants of Health (SDH), little is known about food insecurity in the pediatric ED. Additionally, there are limited data on how to implement FI screening into practice in a way that maximizes elicitation of social need, while assuring patient and family comfort.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Screening
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •English speaking
- •Adult caregiver accompanying pediatric patient in the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) emergency department
排除标准
- •Patient (child) in critical condition
- •Patient (child) >18 years of age
- •Previously enrolled in study
结局指标
主要结局
Presence of Food Insecurity
时间窗: 12 months
Affirmative response to either of the two, validated screening questions for food insecurity. Investigators measured food insecurity using the validated two-question "Hunger Vital Sign" screening tool, with yes/no responses. These two questions are: within the past 12 months "we worried whether our food would run out before we got money to buy more" and "the food we bought just didn't last and we didn't have money to get more."
次要结局
- Preferred Screening Modality(4 weeks)
- Comfort level with screening location(4 weeks)
