跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2019/05/019006
CTRI/2019/05/019006尚未招募不适用

Prospective comparative study of laproscopic totally extraperitoneal repair for inguinal hernia with light weight polypropylene mesh v/s 3D anatomically shaped large pore polypropylene mesh.

Department of Surgery1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 50 人开始时间: 2019年5月17日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
入组人数
50
试验地点
1
主要终点
To achieve laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair with least post operative pain and complications .

研究概览

简要总结

In  this study regarding laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia , two groups of 25-25 patients-total sample size of 50 patients selected randomly - will be compared in terms of inguinal hernia repair by light weight polypropylene mesh v/s 3D  anatomically shaped large pore polypropylene mesh.

Outcome in terms of which method is better and has least post operative hospital stay along with least complications will be measured.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Computer generated randomization
盲法
Not Applicable

入排标准

年龄范围
20.00 Year(s) 至 80.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • All the patients of age between 20 to 80 years.

排除标准

  • Patient having history of Preperitoneal surgery done.
  • Patient who are unfit for general anestheisa.

结局指标

主要结局

To achieve laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair with least post operative pain and complications .

时间窗: 3 days | 1 week | 2 week | 1 month

Time taken for mesh fixation.

时间窗: 3 days | 1 week | 2 week | 1 month

Length of hospital stay .

时间窗: 3 days | 1 week | 2 week | 1 month

次要结局

  • Time taken for discharge from the hospital.(Least chances of recurrence.)

研究者

申办方类型
Government medical college

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验