跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT07677241
NCT07677241已完成不适用

Comparison of a New Gas Exchange Measurement System During Exercise With a Reference System

University Hospital, Grenoble1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 20 人开始时间: 2026年7月6日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
20
试验地点
1
主要终点
Comparison of ventilatory flow (VE) and carbon dioxide output (VCO₂) measurements obtained using the two systems.

研究概览

简要总结

Gas exchange measurement systems are complex and require specialized facilities and expertise. As a result, access to these measurements remains limited, particularly in the field of sports performance. The aim of this validation study was to compare measurements obtained with a reference device and a new portable system.

详细描述

Exercise gas exchange measurement is the gold-standard method for assessing maximal and submaximal aerobic performance. The measured variables are essential for the objective evaluation of exercise performance.

These parameters are used to assess an individual's performance level, determine training zones, and thereby personalize training programs. Their accuracy is therefore of critical importance.

However, the assessment of ventilatory parameters is complex, as it relies on measurements of airflow (using pneumotachographs) and gas concentrations in inspired and expired air (using O₂- and CO₂-sensitive sensors). The physical properties and composition of air differ between inspiration and expiration. In particular, the saturation of expired air with water vapor-which does not behave as an ideal gas-introduces significant challenges and can reduce the reliability of current measurement systems.

The accumulation of these individual sources of measurement error ultimately determines the overall quality and accuracy of a commercial gas exchange analysis system.

Nevertheless, athletes and coaches require regular access to these measurements in order to prescribe appropriate training intensities and evaluate training effectiveness. A recent comparative study of several commercially available portable systems highlighted substantial variability in both measurement accuracy and overall performance among existing devices. Consequently, the availability of a simple, accessible, and, above all, more accurate measurement system would represent a significant advance for the sports performance community.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Case Control
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Male or female adults (aged ≥ 18 years).
  • Individuals affiliated with, or benefiting from, a health insurance or social security scheme.
  • Individuals capable of understanding and signing an informed consent form.
  • Individuals fluent in French.

排除标准

  • Current tobacco smoking.
  • Any cardiovascular, respiratory, or musculoskeletal condition that could impair the ability to perform a maximal exercise test.
  • Individuals unwilling or unable to provide written informed consent.
  • Individuals with hierarchical, family, or close personal relationships with the principal investigator.

结局指标

主要结局

Comparison of ventilatory flow (VE) and carbon dioxide output (VCO₂) measurements obtained using the two systems.

时间窗: During the 5-minute rest period and throughout the exercise test until exhaustion. 30 minutes total.

Equivalence of measurements within a 5% margin of error.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
University Hospital, Grenoble
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验