跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05210062
NCT05210062Unknown不适用

Impact of Closely Grouped, Iterative Exposures to Suxamethonium During Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) on the Sensitization to Neuro-Muscular Blocking Agents (NMBA) and the Development of Protective Antibodies

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 70 人开始时间: 2022年1月27日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
入组人数
70
试验地点
1
主要终点
Evaluate the development of specific antibodies against suxamethonium (type IgG4 anti-suxamethonium) after iterative exposure to ECT at 10 weeks.

研究概览

简要总结

Acute per-anesthetic hypersensitivity reaction (HSA-PA) is a rapidly occurring systemic reaction following injection of a drug during anesthesia (mortality between 3 and 9%). The substances responsible for these reactions in France are Neuro-Muscular Blocking Agents (NMBA) in 60% of cases. The main mechanism mentioned is an immediate systemic hypersensitivity immune reaction (anaphylaxis). The mechanism of immunization to NMBA is not yet understood.

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a long-standing therapeutic approach still widely used today, for its high efficiency, particularly in depressive syndromes resistant to antidepressants. It has an efficacy comparable (or even superior) to pharmacological treatments and improves the mortality associated with this disease. Treatment with iterative ECT sessions includes an attack phase with an average of 12 sessions over 4 weeks, with secondary spacing of sessions before switching to antidepressant treatment. These sessions are carried out in the operating room under general anesthesia, thanks to a hypnotic and a NMBA, suxamethonium, as recently recommended by the French Anesthesiology Society in 2020.

ECT therefore represent an interesting model of iterative exposure of a relatively homogeneous population to a single highly sensitizing substance, which could make it possible to study the evolution of sensitization as a function of various factors, in particular cumulative exposure, for which no data is currently available.

详细描述

Acute per-anesthetic hypersensitivity reaction (HSA-PA) is a rapidly occurring systemic reaction following injection of a drug during anesthesia (mortality between 3 and 9%). The substances responsible for these reactions are different types of Neuro-Muscular Blocking Agents (NMBA) in 60% of cases. The main mechanism mentioned is an immediate systemic hypersensitivity immune reaction (anaphylaxis). Anaphylactic reactions are classically described as IgE-dependent, triggered by the allergen which, by bridging specific IgE antibodies on the surface of mast cells and basophils, induces a massive release, in particular of histamine, which is responsible for the symptoms. Other immunological mechanisms, in particular by specific IgGs, have been described. The mechanism of immunization to Neuro-Muscular Blocking Agents (NMBA) is not yet understood. The quaternary ammonium group (AQ) is the common epitope of NMBA recognized by IgE. Due to the absence of previous exposure to NMBA reported in 50% of patients with HSA-PA to NMBA, other substances carrying substituted AQ ions are suspected of inducing cross-sensitization, such as household cleaners, cosmetics or drug (pholcodine). However, the sensitizing role of NMBA themselves is not established, and no study has analyzed iterative exposure to Neuro-Muscular Blocking Agents (NMBA) as a sensitizing factor.

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a long-standing therapeutic approach still widely used today, for its high efficiency, particularly in depressive syndromes resistant to antidepressants. It has an efficacy comparable (or even superior) to pharmacological treatments and improves the mortality associated with this disease. Treatment with iterative ECT sessions includes an attack phase with an average of 12 sessions over 4 weeks, with secondary spacing of sessions before switching to antidepressant treatment. These sessions are carried out in the operating room under general anesthesia, thanks to a hypnotic and a NMBA, suxamethonium, as recently recommended by the French Anesthesiology Society in 2020.

ECT therefore represent an interesting model of iterative exposure of a relatively homogeneous population to a single highly sensitizing substance, which could make it possible to study the evolution of sensitization as a function of various factors, in particular cumulative exposure, for which no data is currently available.

A single patient group is planned in this study, consisting of patients with a medical indication for ECT for psychiatric pathologies resistant to medical treatment (depression, mania, hallucinatory episode in particular). The study will take place in two parts: a preliminary phase "phase P" in 10 patients (with previous exposure to ECT) and a "phase E" study phase in 60 patients. For phase E, only patients with first-time access to ECT or without ECT in the previous ten years will be eligible.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Case Only
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patient requiring iterative exposure to ECT as part of their psychiatric pathology in one of the investigator center
  • Patient who has not had ECT in the last 10 years for the phase E group, regardless of their previous ECT exposure for the phase P group
  • Patient who has been informed and has signed the consent form

排除标准

  • Absence of written informed consent
  • Allergies identified specifically to Neuro-Muscular Blocking Agents (NMBA)
  • Patient under tutelage, curatorship or judicial protection
  • Patient without social security
  • Contraindication to ECT : intracranial hypertension, intracranial lesions without intracranial hypertension, recent episode of cerebral hemorrhage, recent myocardial infarction or embologenic disease, presence of aneurysms or vascular malformations at risk of hemorrhage, retinal detachment, pheochromocytoma, history of ineffective treatment with ECT having had serious side effects, taking anticoagulant treatments

结局指标

主要结局

Evaluate the development of specific antibodies against suxamethonium (type IgG4 anti-suxamethonium) after iterative exposure to ECT at 10 weeks.

时间窗: 10 weeks

Development of specific antibodies against suxamethonium

Incidence of protective antibodies against suxamethonium assessed by the presence of specific anti-suxamethonium IgG4 antibodies (via ImmunoCAP method) following iterative exposure to ECT after 10 weeks.

时间窗: 10 weeks

Incidence of protective antibodies against suxamethonium

次要结局

  • Evaluate the development of specific IgE antibodies against quaternary ammoniums and suxamethonium after iterative exposure to ECT at 2 weeks.(2 weeks)
  • Evaluate the development of specific IgG antibodies against quaternary ammoniums and suxamethonium after iterative exposure to ECT at 4 weeks.(4 weeks)
  • Evaluate the development of specific IgG4 antibodies against quaternary ammoniums and suxamethonium after iterative exposure to ECT at 2 weeks.(2 weeks)
  • Evaluate the development of specific IgG4 antibodies against quaternary ammoniums and suxamethonium after iterative exposure to ECT at 10 weeks.(10 weeks)
  • Evaluate the evolution of anti-suxamethonium IgE/IgG4 ratio, described as an evaluation factor during desensitization procedures before exposure to ECT at 4 weeks.(4 weeks)
  • Evaluate the evolution of anti-quaternary ammoniums IgE/IgG4 ratio, described as an evaluation factor during desensitization procedures before exposure to ECT at 10 weeks.(10 weeks)
  • Evaluate the evolution of anti-rocuronium IgE/IgG4 ratio, described as an evaluation factor during desensitization procedures before exposure to ECT at 4 weeks.(4 weeks)
  • Evaluate the evolution of polarization of memory T cells before and after iterative exposure to ECT at 10 weeks via flow cytometry after re-stimulation with NMBA.(10 weeks)
  • Evaluate whether iterative exposure induces cross-reactivity against rocuronium by quantitative analysis of anti-rocuronium IgE.(18 months)
  • Evaluate whether iterative exposure induces cross-reactivity against rocuronium by quantitative analysis of anti-rocuronium IgG.(18 months)
  • Evaluate the development of specific IgG antibodies against quaternary ammoniums and suxamethonium after iterative exposure to ECT at 2 weeks.(2 weeks)
  • Evaluate the development of specific IgE antibodies against quaternary ammoniums and suxamethonium after iterative exposure to ECT at 4 weeks.(4 weeks)
  • Evaluate the evolution of anti-suxamethonium IgE/IgG4 ratio, described as an evaluation factor during desensitization procedures before exposure to ECT at 2 weeks.(2 weeks)
  • Evaluate circulating concentrations of tolerogenic factors (IL-10, IL-4, TGF-beta) before the first exposure to ECT.(Week 0)
  • Evaluate circulating concentrations of tolerogenic factors (IL-10, IL-4, TGF-beta) at 10 weeks.(10 weeks)
  • Evaluate the persistence of antibodies (IgE and IgG4 against quaternary ammoniums and suxamethonium) detected at 10 weeks since the last exposure to ECT.(10 weeks)
  • Evaluate the persistence of antibodies (IgE and IgG4 against quaternary ammoniums and suxamethonium) detected at 6 months since the last exposure to ECT.(6 months)
  • Incidence of specific IgE antibodies against quaternary ammonium, suxamethonium and rocuronium at 10 weeks.(10 weeks)
  • Evaluate the development of specific IgE antibodies against quaternary ammoniums and suxamethonium after iterative exposure to ECT at 10 weeks.(10 weeks)
  • Evaluate the evolution of anti-quaternary ammoniums IgE/IgG4 ratio, described as an evaluation factor during desensitization procedures before exposure to ECT at 2 weeks.(2 weeks)
  • Evaluate the evolution of anti-rocuronium IgE/IgG4 ratio, described as an evaluation factor during desensitization procedures before exposure to ECT at 10 weeks.(10 weeks)
  • Incidence of specific IgE antibodies against quaternary ammonium, suxamethonium and rocuronium at 2 weeks.(2 weeks)
  • Incidence of specific IgG against quaternary ammonium, suxamethonium and rocuronium at 2 weeks.(2 weeks)
  • Incidence of specific IgG4 against quaternary ammonium, suxamethonium and rocuronium at 6 months.(6 months)
  • Levels of specific IgE antibodies against quaternary ammonium, suxamethonium and rocuronium before the ECT session.(18 months)
  • Evaluate the development of specific IgG antibodies against quaternary ammoniums and suxamethonium after iterative exposure to ECT at 10 weeks.(10 weeks)
  • Describe the antibody profile before exposure to NMBA, and the potential link with previous drug exposures in the previous year of antidepressant, mood stabilizers and anxiolytics.(18 months)
  • Incidence of specific IgG against quaternary ammonium, suxamethonium and rocuronium at 4 weeks.(4 weeks)
  • Incidence of specific IgG4 against quaternary ammonium, suxamethonium and rocuronium at 10 weeks.(10 weeks)
  • Levels of specific IgG4 antibodies against quaternary ammonium, suxamethonium and rocuronium before the ECT session.(18 months)
  • Cytokine profile, particularly pro-tolerogenic, and development of Tregs lymphocytes.(18 months)
  • Risk factors: number of ECT sessions, exposure to pholcodine before or during the study, occupational exposure to quaternary ammoniums (hairdressers, cleaning agents, beauticians).(18 months)
  • Assay of ACTH, cortisol at week 0.(Week 0)
  • Evaluate the development of specific IgG4 antibodies against quaternary ammoniums and suxamethonium after iterative exposure to ECT at 4 weeks.(4 weeks)
  • Evaluate the evolution of anti-suxamethonium IgE/IgG4 ratio, described as an evaluation factor during desensitization procedures before exposure to ECT at 10 weeks.(10 weeks)
  • Evaluate the evolution of anti-quaternary ammoniums IgE/IgG4 ratio, described as an evaluation factor during desensitization procedures before exposure to ECT at 4 weeks.(4 weeks)
  • Evaluate the evolution of anti-rocuronium IgE/IgG4 ratio, described as an evaluation factor during desensitization procedures before exposure to ECT at 2 weeks.(2 weeks)
  • Incidence of specific IgE antibodies against quaternary ammonium, suxamethonium and rocuronium at 4 weeks.(4 weeks)
  • Incidence of specific IgG4 against quaternary ammonium, suxamethonium and rocuronium at 4 weeks.(4 weeks)
  • Assay of ACTH, cortisol at week 10.(Week 10)
  • Evaluate the influence of hormonal changes induced by ECT on immunization.(18 months)
  • Incidence of specific IgG against quaternary ammonium, suxamethonium and rocuronium at 10 weeks.(10 weeks)
  • Incidence of specific IgG4 against quaternary ammonium, suxamethonium and rocuronium at 2 weeks.(2 weeks)
  • Exposures of the previous year to antidepressant, mood stabilizers and anxiolytics.(18 months)
  • Incidence of specific IgE antibodies against quaternary ammonium, suxamethonium and rocuronium at 6 months.(6 months)
  • Incidence of specific IgG against quaternary ammonium, suxamethonium and rocuronium 6 months.(6 months)
  • Levels of specific IgG antibodies against quaternary ammonium, suxamethonium and rocuronium before the ECT session.(18 months)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Impact of Closely Grouped, Iterative Exposures to... | 临床试验