跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05525897
NCT05525897Unknown不适用

A Multi-case Feasibility Study for an Introductory Psychoeducational Course (Life Skills 101) for Students in Higher Education

University of Cyprus5 个研究点 分布在 4 个国家目标入组 120 人开始时间: 2022年7月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
入组人数
120
试验地点
5
主要终点
Feasibility and Acceptability

研究概览

简要总结

In the present study, the investigators aim to examine the feasibility of embedding a classroom-based soft skills intervention within a tertiary curriculum.

The primary objective of this study is to assess the acceptability and feasibility of the "Life Skills 101", a novel psychoeducational course for students in higher education.

The secondary objective of this study is to evaluate potential effectiveness of the course by measuring students' acquired knowledge and improvement on self-insight.

Different methodologies will be used as part of the stage model for behavioral intervention development. In specific, three universities (CY, GR, SP) will run a single-arm study, while the fourth university (NL) will run an RCT pilot study.

详细描述

Background/Rationale The role of Higher Education in sustained economic growth, and social progress is critical. HE institutions (HEIs) as key 'future shaper' settings, host a significant proportion of talented youth, future workforce, and leaders. Entering university marks a turning point for youth, since HEIs can empower young people to transform and expand skills to manage complex and global environmental and societal challenges.

Soft skills, such as the ability to set goals and achieve them, to regulate emotions, to demonstrate agility and adaptability, and manage interpersonal relationships, are now an emerging trend for tackling global economic and societal challenges. Despite soft skills importance, evidence confirms a "skills gap", meaning that youth lack soft skills that are highly important in the workplace. In addition, soft skills related to mental and physical health, wellbeing and adjustment, have received growing interest over recent years, and have become even more critical in the context of emerging needs to build resilience in the face of the Covid-19 pandemic and in preparation for future crises.

Given these challenges to individuals' academic performance, work achievement, mental health, it would be advisable to equip students with the resources required for life success. As these skills become increasingly of central interest to communities, it becomes a pertinent question on how to expand them within the academic context by learning relevant information and practicing skills in a way that is responsive to the needs of the wider student community. A key priority for HEIs is to promote a comprehensive approach to education, by putting students' transversal skills on an equal footing with profession-specific knowledge and skills. One efficient way to address this, in a way that can reach as many interested students as possible, is through incorporating the necessary material in existing, popular and frequently offered elective or mandatory courses, in which training these skills is suitable.

In the present study, the investigators aim to examine the feasibility of embedding a classroom-based soft skills intervention within a tertiary curriculum. This course covers cutting-edge research on how people acquire self-regulatory skills enabling them to achieve personal, academic, and professional goals. Students will learn through instruction and experiential methods, how these discoveries relate to needs, cognitions, emotions, and behaviors, and what tools can be used to achieve their goals.

Study aims/Objectives

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Other
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • 未提供

排除标准

  • 未提供

结局指标

主要结局

Feasibility and Acceptability

时间窗: up to 10 weeks

At post-intervention, all participants will complete a course satisfaction/acceptability questionnaire. The questionnaire will consist of two parts: In part A (quantitative) students will be asked several Likert-scale questions, while part B (qualitative) while contain open-ended response questions relating to their experience, satisfaction, and the challenges/enablers associated with design and implementation of the course. Qualitative data from open-ended questions will be considered alongside the quantitative measures to assess the feasibility of the intervention. The feasibility and acceptability of the intervention will be evaluated, using multiple primary endpoints such as: 1. Adherence (Total registrations, Attendance Rates, Homework Adherence, Dropouts, App Downloads, App use) 2. Acceptability (Course acceptability, course satisfaction, perceptions measured by both Likert Scale Questionnaire and open-ended questions).

Self-efficacy

时间窗: up to 10 weeks

The General self-efficacy scale (GSE) consists of 10-items on a 4-point Likert scale (1 'not at all true' to 4 'exactly true'). A total score, on a scale of 10 to 40 can be calculated. Higher scores indicate higher perceived general self-efficacy. Its internal consistency is good (Cronbach α = .85).

次要结局

  • Private Self-Consciousness (PrSC) dimension of Self-Consciousness Scale(up to 10 weeks)
  • Trait worry(up to 10 weeks)
  • Single-item self-assessment questions(up to 10 weeks)
  • Psychological flexibility(up to 10 weeks)
  • Positive mental health(up to 10 weeks)
  • Knowledge(up to 10 weeks)
  • Self-Reflection and Insight Scale- Short Form(up to 10 weeks)
  • Depression, anxiety and stress(up to 10 weeks)
  • Personal growth mindset(up to 10 weeks)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Prof. Georgia Panayiotou

Dr. Georgia Panayiotou, Professor of Clinical Psychology

University of Cyprus

研究点 (5)

Loading locations...

相似试验