跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT07326397
NCT07326397尚未招募3 期

Comparative Evaluation of Intrathecal Dexmedetomidine and Magnesium Sulphate as Adjuvants to 0.5% Hyperbaric Bupivacaine for Spinal Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) Fixation: A Randomized Clinical Study

Assiut University0 个研究点目标入组 92 人开始时间: 2026年2月1日最近更新:
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
3 期
状态
尚未招募
入组人数
92
主要终点
Highest Dermatome Level of Sensory Block

研究概览

简要总结

To compare the efficacy and safety of intrathecal dexmedetomidine and magnesium sulphate as adjuvants to 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine in patients undergoing elective DHS fixation, focusing on onset and duration of sensory and motor block, hemodynamic stability, and quality of postoperative analgesia.

详细描述

Spinal anesthesia is a preferred technique for lower limb orthopedic surgeries due to its rapid onset, reliable sensory and motor blockade, and minimal systemic side effects. Hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% is commonly used; however, its duration may be insufficient for prolonged procedures or postoperative analgesia. To enhance and prolong anesthesia and analgesia, various intrathecal adjuvants have been investigated.

Dexmedetomidine, a selective α2-adrenergic agonist, has shown promise in improving the quality and duration of spinal anesthesia by providing prolonged sensory and motor blockade, stable hemodynamics, and enhanced postoperative analgesia. Similarly, magnesium sulphate, an NMDA receptor antagonist, exerts antinociceptive effects by modulating calcium influx in nerve cells, potentially prolonging analgesia without significant motor blockade.

Dynamic hip screw (DHS) fixation is a common surgical intervention for intertrochanteric femur fractures, particularly in elderly patients. These procedures demand reliable intraoperative anesthesia and effective postoperative pain control to facilitate early mobilization and reduce complications.

Despite individual studies evaluating these agents, direct comparisons between intrathecal dexmedetomidine and magnesium sulphate as adjuvants to bupivacaine in DHS fixation remain limited. This study aims to compare their efficacy and safety in enhancing spinal anesthesia, thereby optimizing perioperative care in patients undergoing elective DHS fixation.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Other
盲法
Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 65 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Age: 18-65 year
  • ASA Physical Status I or II
  • Scheduled for elective DHS fixation under spinal anesthesia
  • Written informed consent provided
  • Patients of both sex are included in the study.

排除标准

  • Patient refusal
  • Allergy to study drugs
  • Local infection at injection site
  • Neurological or psychiatric illness
  • Coagulopathy
  • Chronic opioid or sedative use

研究组 & 干预措施

Group D (Dexmedetomidine)

Active Comparator

干预措施: Dexmedetomidine (Drug)

Group M (Magnesium Sulphate)

Active Comparator

干预措施: Magnesium Sulphate (Drug)

结局指标

主要结局

Highest Dermatome Level of Sensory Block

时间窗: 24 hours after intervention

Sensory block level assessed using a pinprick test and recorded as the highest dermatome level with loss of sensation.

Duration of postoperative analgesia

时间窗: 24 hours after intervention

The outcome is Measured by Vas Score to assess pain intensity. It consists of a numeric version of the visual analogue scale. It is a horizontal line with an eleven point numeric range. It is labeled from zero to ten, with zero being an example of someone with no pain and ten being the worst pain possible. This scale can be administered verbally. Vas score for 24 h will be assessed at 0., 1, 12 and 24 h postoperatively and will be recorded.

Degree of Motor Block

时间窗: 24 hours after intervention

Motor block assessed using the Modified Bromage Scale (0-3), where higher scores indicate greater motor block.

次要结局

  • Heart Rate(24 hours after intervention)
  • Incidence of Adverse Effects(24 hours after Intervention)
  • Mean Arterial Pressure(24 hours after intervention)
  • Oxygen Saturation(24 hours after intervention)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Shehab Fathy Ahmed Osman

Resident doctor at Assiut University Hospital, Assiut, Egypt

Assiut University

相似试验