跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03109678
NCT03109678已完成不适用

A Comparison of the Intubating Laryngeal Mask FASTRACH™ and the Intubating Laryngeal Mask Ambu Aura-i™

Asklepios Kliniken Hamburg GmbH0 个研究点目标入组 80 人开始时间: 2011年7月12日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
80
主要终点
success rate of blind intubation

研究概览

简要总结

The intubating laryngeal mask Fastrach™ is considered a gold standard for blind intubation as well as for fibreoptic guided intubation via a laryngeal mask. Recently, a single use version of the mask has been introduced. The Fastrach single use laryngeal mask is beng compared to the new, low-priced single use intubating laryngeal mask Ambu Aura-i™.

详细描述

Eighty patients undergoing general anaesthesia with planned tracheal intubation for elective surgical procedures are enrolled in the study after checking for inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients are randomised to either LMA group for blind tracheal intubation with either a standard PVC tracheal tube, or a specifically for the LMA Fastrach developed tube, yielding 4 subgroups.

After a standardised anaesthesia induction, blind intubation is performed in each study group. Different time intervals are documented, such as time to first adequate lung ventilation, or f.e. time for laryngeal mask placement. A crossover-design is performed after unsuccessful intubation, using the alternate LMA or the other tracheal tube. LMA placement is visualised by fibreoptic control.

An estimated success rate for blind intubation of 60% in the Aura-i group versus 90% in the Fastrach group yields a sample size of n= 38. To compensate for dropouts, n=40 subjects are enrolled in each group.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Crossover
主要目的
Device Feasibility
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
15 Years 至 80 Years(Child, Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • patients undergoing planned general anaesthesia
  • planned tracheal intubation
  • elective surgical procedure
  • 15 to 80 years of age

排除标准

  • ASA physical status IV and V
  • severe pulmonary comorbidity (COPD GOLD >III, bronchial asthma)
  • indication for rapid-sequence induction
  • mouth opening (interincisor distance) <3cm
  • morbid obesity (BMI >35kg.m-2)

结局指标

主要结局

success rate of blind intubation

时间窗: through study completion; time frame for individual study patient: two attempts of blind tracheal intubation peri-interventional, time maximum of 300 seconds

overall success rate of blind tracheal intubation within two attempts using either the FASTRACH™ laryngeal mask or the Ambu Aura-i™ laryngeal mask

次要结局

  • subjective handling score(through study completion; the handling of the laryngeal masks during the first placement attempt within 60 seconds; directly after placing laryngeal masks and before fibreoptic visualisation, the subjective handling score is documented as above)
  • influence of tracheal tubes(through study completion; time frame for individual study patient: two attempts of blind tracheal intubation peri-interventional, time maximum of 300 seconds)
  • equivalence of the laryngeal masks regarding fibreoptic visualisation(through study completion; after placing the laryngeal mask and checking for airway leak pressure, fibreoptic visualisation is performed within 60 seconds)
  • differences in airway leak pressure(through study completion; right after placing the laryngeal mask and checking for correct positioning, ALP is documented within 60 seconds)
  • incidence of postoperative sore throat and hoarseness(patient interview 24 hours post procedural)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Dr. Robert Schiewe

Doctor

Asklepios Kliniken Hamburg GmbH

相似试验

A Comparison of the Intubating Laryngeal Mask... | 临床试验