跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05258214
NCT05258214已完成不适用

Mulligan Bent Leg Raise Versus Mulligan Traction Straight Leg Raise Versus Neural Mobilization With Conventional Therapy On Pain & Functional Disability In Patient With Lumber Radiculopathy

Riphah International University2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 60 人开始时间: 2021年3月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
60
试验地点
2
主要终点
Modified Oswestry low back pain questionnaire

研究概览

简要总结

The goal of this study is to compare the effectiveness of mulligan traction Straight Leg Raise and mulligan's bent leg rise and neural mobilization to conventional therapies in order to assess which treatment is more successful in treating lumbar radiculopathy-related dysfunction.

详细描述

After the synopsis is approved, Randomized Control Trial study will be performed at Riphah International University Faisalabad. The patients will be enrolled using a targeted sampling method. Patients would be chosen based on pre-established inclusion and exclusion requirements. For this analysis, a sample size estimate shows that 30 randomly selected male or females (18 yrs - 65 yrs) who match the selection criteria will be needed. A basic random sample of 30 lumbar radiculopathy patients was used in an experimental trial. They were divided into three groups of ten people: Group A received neural mobilization with conventional therapy, Group B received mulligan's bent leg rise with conventional therapy, and Group C received mulligan's traction Straight Leg Raise with conventional therapy for six months. Numeric Pain Rating Scale, passive Straight Leg Raise, Goniometer, and modified Oswestry low back pain Questionnaire will be used as outcome tests. After the sixth week, the pre-treatment and post-treatment results will be compared. Each patient will be asked to give their informed consent. Statistical Package of Social Sciences Version 20 can be used for data entry and analysis.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single (Participant)

盲法说明

Single Blinding will be performed in this study

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 65 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Between the ages of 18 and 65, all genders
  • positive slump measure of lumbar specific nerve bias,
  • mild to moderate irritation on a Numeric Pain Level Scale of less than seven,
  • unilateral radiculopathy in the distribution of a single nerve with a favourable SLR,
  • prone knee bent test; positve test,
  • hypoaesthesia in a specific dermatome of the unilateral lower limb, accompanied by reduced mobility
  • the result of the deep tendon (knee jerk, ankle jerk).

排除标准

  • individuals with gradually occurring neurological problems
  • Trauma, cancer, and constitutional symptoms are indeed red flags (Fever, Malaise, Weight Loss).
  • Hip and knee fractures are common.
  • Lower-extremity dislocations.
  • Hamstring strains.
  • Joint hypermobility of the lower limb.
  • Muscle imbalance in lower limb
  • Nerve lesions in the lower extremity.
  • Subjects who have had low back pain in the previous two months.
  • Hip flexion ROM was greater than 100 degrees for the straight knee.
  • Neurological defects.
  • Metal bolts, plates, or screws in the femur.

结局指标

主要结局

Modified Oswestry low back pain questionnaire

时间窗: 12th Week

Modified Oswestry low back pain questionnaire is an extremely important tool that researchers and disability evaluators use to measure a patient's permanent functional disability. The test is considered the 'gold standard' of low back functional outcome tools

Numeric pain rating scale

时间窗: 12th Week

The Numerical Pain Rating Scale is a subjective measure in which individuals rate their pain on an eleven-point numerical scale. The scale is composed of 0; no pain at all to 10; worst imaginable pain.

Goniometer

时间窗: 12th Week

Goniometer has been the most widely used tool for measuring joint range of motion. To ensure reliable measurement, standardized, specific positions and landmarks are used to measure each joint movement.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验