跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03630484
NCT03630484已完成不适用

Comparison Between Ventilator Hyperinflation and Manual Rib Cage Compression: Randomized Crossover Trial

Brazilian Institute of Higher Education of Censa0 个研究点目标入组 30 人开始时间: 2014年11月28日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
30
主要终点
Static compliance of respiratory system

研究概览

简要总结

This is a randomized crossover trial to evaluate the effects of thoracic compression applied alone or in association with hyperinflation maneuver with the ventilator. In addition, the mobilized volume and peak expiratory flow resulting from both maneuvers will be evaluated.

详细描述

Ventilator hyperinflation is widely used in hypersecretive patients. It consists of increasing alveolar ventilation by facilitating the coughing mechanism so that the secretions of the peripheral airways are mobilized into the central airways so that they can be removed by tracheal aspiration or cough. Thoracic compression consists of manually compressing the rib cage during expiration, in order to increase expiratory flow, mobilize and remove pulmonary secretions. A randomized crossover clinical trial was performed with 30 patients submitted to isolated compression or associated with ventilator hyperinflation, with a 6 hour interval. Patients were evaluated through compliance and resistance of the respiratory system.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Crossover
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 90 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • patients under mechanical ventilation
  • diagnosis of pulmonary infection
  • hypersecretive

排除标准

  • haemodynamic instability (heart rate > 130 bpm and mean arterial pressure < 60 mmHg)
  • acute bronchospasm
  • acute respiratory distress syndrome
  • untreated pneumothorax

研究组 & 干预措施

Expiratory Rib Cage Compression

Active Comparator

Expiratory rib cage compression was performed in 6 sets of 6 cycles, with 1 cycle interval. Ventilatory mode and parameters were maintained.

干预措施: Expiratory Rib Cage Compression (Other)

Compression + Ventilator Hyperinflation

Active Comparator

Expiratory rib cage compression was performed in 6 sets of 6 cycles, with 1 cycle interval. Ventilator hyperinflation was performed by increasing the inspiratory pressure to every 5 cmH2O until the total pressure reached 40 cmH2O, remaining the same.

干预措施: Compression + Ventilator Hyperinflation (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

Static compliance of respiratory system

时间窗: Baseline (before), immediately after ventilator hyperinflation or rib cage compression and five minutes after aspiration

Compliance was assessed through the occlusion maneuver at the end of inspiration, considering tidal volume, plateau pressure and PEEP. Three measurements were taken at each moment, the mean being used.

Total Resistance of respiratory system

时间窗: Baseline (before), immediately after ventilator hyperinflation or rib cage compression and five minutes after aspiration

The total resistance of the respiratory system was evaluated through the occlusion maneuver at the end of the inspiration, considering the resistive pressure, measured by the difference between the maximum plateau pressure. Three measurements were taken at each moment, the mean being used.

Airway Resistance

时间窗: Baseline (before), immediately after ventilator hyperinflation or rib cage compression and five minutes after aspiration

The airway resistance was assessed by means of the occlusion maneuver at the end of the inspiration, considering the rapid fall of the pressure immediately after the occlusion, measured by the difference between the maximum pressure and P1. Three measurements were taken at each moment, the mean being used.

Peak expiratory flow

时间窗: Baseline (before), immediately after ventilator hyperinflation or rib cage compression and five minutes after aspiration

The peak expiratory flow was evaluated through passive expiration, being considered the greatest value of the flow in the expiratory phase.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
Brazilian Institute of Higher Education of Censa
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Luciano Matos Chicayban

Principal Investigator

Brazilian Institute of Higher Education of Censa

相似试验