跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03663842
NCT03663842已完成不适用

Effectiveness of a Novel Neural Tissue Management to Improve Short-term Pain and Disability in Patients With Sciatica

Centro Universitário Augusto Motta0 个研究点目标入组 44 人开始时间: 2010年5月10日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
44
主要终点
Pain intensity

研究概览

简要总结

Objectives: To analyse the effects of sciatic neural mobilisation, in combination to the treatment of the surrounding structures, on pain and disability. Secondly, to investigate baseline characteristics that may be associated with improvements in pain and lumbar disability. Methods: Twenty-eight patients with a clinical diagnosis of sciatica were treated with neural mobilization, joint mobilisation and soft tissue techniques. Pain intensity and lumbar disability were assessed at baseline and after treatment using a Numerical Rating Scale (0-10) and the Oswestry Disability Index (0-100), respectively. The pre- and post-intervention data were compared.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Na
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Low back pain with radiating leg pain and/or paresthesia below the knee that follows the L5 and/or S1 dermatomal pattern.

排除标准

  • History of lumbar and abdominal surgery
  • Rheumatologic syndromes (e.g. Rheumatoid arthritis);
  • Lumbar stenosis.

研究组 & 干预措施

Neural tissue management

Experimental

Myofascial release technique; Hip joint mobilization technique; Cross-fiber friction over the sacroiliac joints; Neural mobilization to improve sciatic nerve excursion.

干预措施: Physical therapy treatment (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

Pain intensity

时间窗: From enrollment to end of treatment at 12 weeks

Measured by the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS 0-10)

Lumbar disability

时间窗: From enrollment to end of treatment at 12 weeks.

Assessed by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).It consists of 10 items addressing different aspects of disability. Each item is scored from 0 to 5, with higher values representing greater disability. The sum of the item scores is divided by the total possible score (50 if all sections are completed), and the resulting total is multiplied by 100 to be described as a percentage score.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
Centro Universitário Augusto Motta
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Renato Almeida

Principal Investigator

Centro Universitário Augusto Motta

相似试验